this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2025
868 points (97.6% liked)

People Twitter

8487 readers
3182 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] korthrun@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Consider a usage other than "fear". Think of something hydrophobic. Do you really think that an inanimate surface is afraid of water?

I don't think it's technically incorrect, I think folks have been taught an overly narrow usage of the suffix.

[–] BunScientist@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Have you seen what waterfalls do to rock? You should be afraid of water!

[–] korthrun@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 month ago

Nooooo don't invoke the wrath of the hydrohomies!

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago

"Aversion" is the most accurate meaning I can think of. It could be aversion out of hate, fear, or something else.

[–] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Fair point. I personally like that it's insulting though so I like the wide definition more.

[–] korthrun@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 month ago

I have no desire to argue that :D Fuck those fucking fucks until they're totally fucked.

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

The fact that someone decided to describe an inanimate object as scared of water doesn't invalidate words with 'phobic'