this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2025
80 points (98.8% liked)
Programmer Humor
26898 readers
753 users here now
Welcome to Programmer Humor!
This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!
For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.
Rules
- Keep content in english
- No advertisements
- Posts must be related to programming or programmer topics
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Go-To's are just a primitive functions that dont isolate code, just use functions.
Not really. There are quite a few of structures you can make with gotos that can't directly be translated into functions. Sure, you can implement any functionality in any programming paradigm, but it might require much more work than to just replace goto with a function call.
In C, goto is basically a necessity though. There is really no good way of error handling.
Options:
Option 1 is really the only reasonable option for large enough codebases.
Option 2 is bad because duplicate code means you might change the cleanup in one code path but not some other. Also duplicate code takes up too much valuable screen space.
Option 3 has a runtime cost. It has double the amount of conditionals per error point. It also adds one level of indentation per error point.
Option 4 is same as option 2 but you edit all error paths in one single place. However, this comes at the cost of having to write 2 functions instead of 1 for every function that can error. And you can still mess up and return while forgetting to call the cleanup function.
You must also consider that erroring functions are contagious, just like async ones. I'd say most of the time a function is propagated upwards, with very few being handled just as it ocurrs. This means that whichever downside your option has, you'll have to deal with it in the whole call stack.