this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2025
417 points (99.3% liked)

196

4620 readers
2297 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 61 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

The thing is they dont "bomb" they create revenue stream and they even make a profit most of the time.

Morbius had a cost of $75–83 million and a Box Office return of $167.5 million
Most of the other recent ones also turned a profit

Of course there are some break evens or minor flops, but they dont care about that, they just want volume. Quantity over quality is what makes for large salaries for bosses.

[–] djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone 61 points 2 days ago (3 children)

A big thing you aren't including in those production costs is marketing, which is a huge part of a film's budget that always gets conveniently left out of these calculations because Hollywood doesn't include marketing costs as part of production...for some reason.

A good rule of thumb is that most studios spend an additional amount roughly equal to 50% of what the film cost to make on marketing. So the total Morbius costed Sony is likely closer to 112m-124m. Still profitable, but quite a thin margin. For Tron:Ares, it'll need to clear ~270m to actually make money. Since most of these studios treat these films like investments, that's p bad RoI.

[–] sauerkrautsaul@lemmus.org 2 points 23 hours ago
[–] ideonek@piefed.social 44 points 2 days ago (2 children)

On the other hand they inflate the cost, by "renting" equipment to themselves, so who the fuck knows what's going on... I would be more concerned with the opportunity costs. Breaking even or even a reasonable profit is just not enought for those gluttonous monsters.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 days ago

It makes some sense for them to rent the equipment to themselves because it effectively adds opportunity cost to the budget. That equipment can't be used on another film, so it has an opportunity cost to the studio to be used in this one. Are the numbers reasonable though? Idk.

[–] justOnePersistentKbinPlease@fedia.io 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

As I understand it as a layman:

  1. They put out a cost to profit that says whatever they are trying to say to investors, the market and potential investors.
  2. They use a 2nd, greatly inflated, number when paying the actors and staff so that very few movies have ever made money according to this method.
[–] bless@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Famously, fucking The Empire Strikes Back didn't make any money

[–] SaraTonin@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

IIRC, Alien didn’t officially make a profit until a couple of years ago.

Hollywood accounting is wild.

[–] ideonek@piefed.social 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I heard one of many trick they do is creating the shell companies to produce a specific movie. Than that company pay for borrowing equipments, studios, licences etc from parent company... And than its bankruped beecouse the move "didn't do that well".. All profits ate transfered upfront, while or costs are part of the bankruptcy process.

[–] justOnePersistentKbinPlease@fedia.io 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The oil industry does a similar thing.

When a well starts approaching end of life, they transfer it to a shell company that only owns the well site and anything they can't profit from / move elsewhere.

So when the well dies, they just leave and the shell company goes bankrupt, leaving the polluted well site behind and taxpayers to pick up the tab.

[–] ideonek@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago

System is working...

[–] burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de 26 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Right, but isn't there literally a saying about how fucked up the 'accounting' is for movies? Something along the lines of "hollywood accounting"...

I wouldn't trust the 'profits' or 'costs' of any of those movies as far as I could throw them.

[–] Denjin@feddit.uk 19 points 2 days ago

The Return of the Jedi grossed $482,466,382 and yet David Prowse has never received a penny in residuals because of the absurd "distribution fees" charged to the production company by 20th Century Fox. It apparently never made any profit.

[–] groet@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago

Yeah when i see "cost 112m" I interpret is as "the producers probaly siphoned 56mil to themselves from the films budget before a single copy was ever sold"