this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2026
860 points (99.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

15092 readers
1218 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
860
Orcas habitat (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by pdqcp@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/fuckcars@lemmy.world
 

I was sent this map without a source but I thought it was impressive nonetheless. It shows the SeaWorld parking lot in yellow. The green dot is where Orcas spend their lives.

edit: This is Seaworld San Diego, California

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 33 points 22 hours ago (6 children)

Here's something I don't understand about these county-devouring parking lots: why are they all one level? Is it more than twice as expensive to build and maintain even a two-level parking structure and save half the footprint?

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 38 points 20 hours ago

One thing America has in abundance is land.

The other thing is greed.

So if you're ever asking " is this option really cheaper?" The answer is that they went with the cheap option.

[–] sirscooter@lemmy.zip 28 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

ROI on even a 2 story parking lot is a lot longer than the one and much more expensive than double the price.

Paving is cheap, easy and other than drainage design is pretty straightforward. Put in drainage, grade land, put down bedding material for the asphalt, put down asphalt and curbing, paint line install signs.

A multi-story garage needs a ton of engineering, concrete and rebar and is custom to each location. Because you have a lot of weight in these structures

If you look at amusement parks that have parking garages most of them are land locked or purchasing new land for parking is so expensive it's cheaper to build a garage

(Please note I'm am a layman about construction, there is probably a construction person or engineer that can explain it better just a theme park fan that likes reading about how the engineer rides and have occasional tumbled over into parking engineering which is a fascinating topic of how much engineering goes into it)

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 22 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I used to work as a drafter at a precast concrete company. We mostly built parking garages.

You're basically correct, paving for a parking lot is cheaper than building a multi story parking garage. A three level parking garage could cost about $20,000,000. And you still have to do the paving on the ground level. The parking garage needs engineering from licensed P.E.'s, hundreds and hundreds of yards of concrete, tons of rebar bent just so and placed just so, thousands of feet of high-strength steel cable, multiple trucks running from our plant to the site over and over to move the parts, then welders, crane operators, grouters, cleanup crew, finishers....

As opposed to just packing the dirt down, pushing some gravel over it, a bit of rebar and an on-site concrete pour.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

From your last sentence, does that mean you still need rebar in a regular parking lot?

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 7 points 18 hours ago

For concrete, yes. Asphalt, no. But concrete floors don’t need bent rebar, you just lay out the sticks in a grid and pour over it.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 7 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

It is more expensive to build multilevel parking but its how the laws work. It might even be that the law required this much parking based on statistical models, which is insane if people are getting there some other way.

Imo we could reduce the size of parking lots by just requiring nearby businesses to allow unrestricted parking during their off hours.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 2 points 18 hours ago

I think sea world is old enough where the land was cheap enough.

Parking structures are something like 5-8 times more expensive per spot.

[–] Rinzler@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago

Yes, a lot of the time it is, depending on land acquisition cost. Plus you then have some amount of additional ongoing maintenance cost for the structure which is also more than just that of a surface lot.

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

Cars constantly emit toxic fumes whenever they're running. If you try to enclose a parking lot you need some extremely expensive and power-intensive ventilation. Maybe that'll change as electric cars become more common.

[–] xorollo@leminal.space 13 points 18 hours ago

Multi level car lots without walls are a common thing in San Diego.

[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 7 points 18 hours ago

Bro’s never seen a parking deck.

[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago

Just don't build walls.