this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2026
1288 points (99.2% liked)

Science Memes

19418 readers
2546 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zwiebel@feddit.org 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This comes from a math problem where the squares size is fixed and you try to minimize the area they fit in

[–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Yeah I know, but it's terrible waffle design, there's big flat chunks without syrup squares. It's a huge amount of wasted area unable to hold syrup in any meaningful volume. It's sad, really.

Edit: not to mention the waffle in the picture is clearly big enough to hold 25 squares the same size as those pictured! I thought these memes were supposed to be scientific...

[–] my_hat_stinks@programming.dev 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You can't fit 25 squares of the same size in that space. If you check the top row there's 4 squares and space for slightly less than one more square, you can't fit a 5x5 grid there unless you have smaller squares or a bigger waffle

[–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Maybe you couldn't, I absolutely could. The space just looks smaller because there's a diagonal square butting into it. Doesn't matter anyway, making the squares smaller was my original comment that sparked this conversation, so I'm right both ways.

[–] my_hat_stinks@programming.dev 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

No, you're not. It's square packing, this is the optimal arrangement of 17 squares inside another square as far as we're currently aware with a side length of 4.6756 inner squares. You cannot fit 5 squares in the space of 4.7 squares of the same size.

It's also a well-known meme and this is a science meme community.

[–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

I'm not concerned about the optimal packing of 17 squares, I'm talking about the waffle in the picture, which visually appears to have plenty of room for 25 squares. I'm guessing it's hard to get a waffle to the exact specifications of a complicated mathematical model, given its composition and construction. But just look at it with your eyes, there is very obviously enough room on that bottom row for two more squares. And if squares still work they way they did when I first learned about them as a young child, that makes room for 25 total small squares. 🤷‍♂️