this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2026
298 points (97.8% liked)
Not The Onion
20868 readers
2937 users here now
Welcome
We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!
The Rules
Posts must be:
- Links to news stories from...
- ...credible sources, with...
- ...their original headlines, that...
- ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”
Please also avoid duplicates.
Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.
And that’s basically it!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
As a defense attorney I would've immediately declared my client mentally disabled and listed the search history as proof.
Good Lord. Pic of internet searches shown in court.
Big "Can u get pregante" vibes.
"how to tell the police that you totally did it and leave every trace imaginable, for ipohen"
That would almost be as bad as writing a six page letter detailing all of your attempted witness tampering and accidentally having it found in your jail cell.
Which is a thing she did.
It could only be worse if that letter included instructions to make threats against someone's children.
Oh. It did.
Look up the "Walk the dog" letter. It is one of the most unbelievably damning pieces of evidence you will ever see. The prosecution literally built their entire closing argument around it because it's so bad that they can just discard the rest of their case and still win on that alone.
You misspelled iphind
Do you mean an iphkne? Common mistake tbf.
Lmao I followed this trial start to finish but mainly listened to it in the background podcast-style so I didn't see most of the closing slides. Didn't realize how many typos were in those searches haha.