this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2026
790 points (97.8% liked)
Not The Onion
20898 readers
1629 users here now
Welcome
We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!
The Rules
Posts must be:
- Links to news stories from...
- ...credible sources, with...
- ...their original headlines, that...
- ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”
Please also avoid duplicates.
Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.
And that’s basically it!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I train guide dog puppies. From the moment they start training they are legally guide dogs. When they are with me, I'm considered legally blind. In this country, denying entrance into a public/commercial space carries a minimum 6.000€ fine. Judges can go up 5 figures.
5 figures is not “set for life” money like everyone seems to be suggesting
"Allow her to retire comfortably"
The debatable part is if they meant immediately retire. Which 5 figures will not let you do. But will it allow her to retire eventually comfortably?
10 year US bond is 4.2%
Let's say she is 30.
Retirement age is 67. So 37 years until retirement.
6,000€ ×5 is ~$35,000
$35,000 at 4.2% interest for 37 years is $160,388.66 (This isn't taking into consideration reinvesting the 4.2% interest after 10 years, but also ignoring things like taxes)
But getting $160k when you retire would allow a lot of people to retire comfortably.
mmm catfood
you expect to live 20 more years on $160K?
160k extra. You have what you're going to normally retire with plus this 160k.
Inflation will eat a good chunk of that
@wavebeam Are people actually suggesting that?
Is that retirement money? Because that's what was stated above.
"Allow her to retire comfortably" is what was stated above.
The debatable part is if they meant immediately retire. If she saves it for retirement then it is "retirement money"
But will it allow her to retire eventually comfortably?
10 year US bond is 4.2%
Let's say she is 30.
Retirement age is 67. So 37 years until retirement.
6,000€ ×5 is ~$35,000
$35,000 at 4.2% interest for 37 years is $160,388.66 (This isn't taking into consideration reinvesting the 4.2% interest after 10 years, but also ignoring things like taxes)
But getting $160k when you retire would allow a lot of people to retire comfortably.
That’s like 4 years of income at a poverty level…
Having 160k + Regular retirement > Regular retirement
lol this happened in america, assuming they've got retirement lined up at all is a bit of a stretch
Yeah so not retirement money lol