this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2026
91 points (88.9% liked)

Fuck Cars

15591 readers
443 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I don't see much talk about that self-evident fact. Asphalt sucks in so many ways. What would be a better alternative that needs not worry about cars but mostly bicycles?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] danielquinn@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

While more resuable than concrete, the process is very energy intensive and requires bitumen every time. It also doesn't last very long.

[–] pc486@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

Bitumen is recyclable, though it isn't nearly as easy as reclaiming the aggregate. And there are techniques where you don't need to expend lots of energy, collectively called "cold in-place recycling."

For example, California's cold recycling program.