this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2026
347 points (98.3% liked)

politics

29477 readers
3888 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 85 points 1 day ago (3 children)

They've had half a decade to fabricate it, let's see if they used the time well.

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well if Kirk "shooter" evidence is any indication of their competence at fabricating evidence.....

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

They're probably getting instructions from OpenAI on how to fake the evidence.

[–] Damage@feddit.it 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

From ChatGPT or like from Bobby the intern?

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 points 7 hours ago
[–] areakode@riskeratspizza.com 29 points 1 day ago

There's definitely a concept of a plan... to get started planning... Or is that health care? We're two weeks away from a plan!

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Thats always the funny thing about this stuff. They COULD have faked it by now, and probably in a way that would be convincing to their base, but you know they are too stupid and lazy to have actually done that.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 3 points 15 hours ago

probably in a way that would be convincing to their base

Their base seems to be capable of being convinced of anything... except facts.

And they fired anyone willing to admit they'd have to make it up.