343
Under pressure Kash Patel claims FBI has ‘evidence’ that 2020 election was stolen
(www.the-independent.com)
He got perma-crazy eyes.
this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2026
343 points (98.3% liked)
politics
29461 readers
2913 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Lying to Congress. Add it to the list.
But we can't show this evidence in court, for reasons.
"Wait! I know who killed Kennedy!!"
Go home Kash, you're drunk.
Love this movie.
Umm... so release what you got? He obviously is full of shit. Lol
In all fairness he was drunk when he made that claim.
Uh-huh. Sure. If I were a betting man, I would put my life savings into Kash being a liar. Probably get $0.01 for winning, considering the odds.
Really? Because I'm pretty sure if he actually had it it would be released by now
This, you can be sure of. If there was evidence it would have been blasted across the airwaves by now and most likely before the 2024 campaign. A lot more Democrats would have lost in 2022, 2024, and even coming up in 2026, if there was actually any evidence...
This is just your standard boilerplate "every accusation is a confession" from the GOPedo.
It was just ~~uncovered~~ fabricated.
He meant to say "despite widespread fraud." He can't release it because his boss's name is on it.
Trump rigged the 2020 election and STILL lost. That's why he's so mad about it.
Fact is, if his opponents were all white men, he would never win at all.
And staged a coup and fucked that up.
You guys nailed it. He's so grrrrr buttmad because of that. When he kept going on about how he'll be "your" retribution, it was more about his revenge fantasies against anyone that stood in his way.
This is both accurate and upsetting, and a step further, had he lost in 16, to anybody. I don’t think he’d have had a chance in 20 if he even ran.
A democrat would have been torn apart over COVID no matter how they handled it.
No way. A strong response against COVID would have been an easy win.
Remember at the beginning of COVID, when Trump was asked "What do you say to Americans who are scared?" A softball question so soft that it would melt in a cup of hot chocolate. Literally any president ever would have a historic soundbite as an answer. George W. Bush would have sounded like the most presidential motherfucker you've ever heard.
Trump said: "I say you're a terrible reporter."
So I think Trump's response to COVID was uniquely disastrous to him on every level. The fact that anyone ever took him seriously will continue to be a national and historical embarrassment.
Yeah, I still believe that if he had said, "Listen to Dr. Fauci here, and buy my 2020 Trump hats," he would have coasted to an easy win that year.
But his own arrogance wouldn't let him do that, of course.
Dude, they couldn’t even keep Trump’s second term out of the way. The good ol’ centrist Democrats were even energizing people for a couple months and shut it all down in favour of supporting Israel and having Harris spend more time with Liz Cheney than her own running mate.
You’re spot-on that folks outside the US think the country is an embarrassing failure, though. Just a bunch of toddlers, cowards, and sychohants.
Oh, Trump was a disaster, don't get me wrong. But we could have had 1000 deaths under President Hillary and the entire media would have been calling it the worst disaster in the history of America. And without Trump to compare it to we never would have known how bad it could be.
Yeah, but then we would've just gotten a regular old run-of-the-mill jerk-off Republican like Romney or Jeb next, and we would have spent the next 4-8 years saying "holy shit, this guy is so awful, how could it be any worse," just blissfully unaware.
How do I immigrate to that timeline?
load more comments
(3 replies)
I think you’re right to a degree, I do think Covid wouldn’t have been AS bad as under Trump. And the GOP still could’ve marched right into a win in 2020, but those years prior when he was president were still extremely damaging to both the sanity and structure of this country. The Supreme Court nominees alone would leave us in a wildly different state not to mention everything else he did to fan the flames of xenophobia and bigotry
The issue is that doing the right thing and doi g the popular thing are often two different things. Covid almost certainly would've been better under Democrat control. It very well could cost them politically though. You can't really compare hypothetical deaths to actual ones, so they wouldn't have a number to tell people they saved. A lot of people would have just complained that they're being forced to do things they don't like, even if it's good.
Yup, When preventive care works it's difficult to explain why it's necessary to the uninformed
Yeah, those three supreme court picks were everything.
load more comments
(2 replies)
That evidence must be at the bottom of a whiskey barrel because the man drinks like he's trying to read it.
They've had half a decade to fabricate it, let's see if they used the time well.
Well if Kirk "shooter" evidence is any indication of their competence at fabricating evidence.....
They're probably getting instructions from OpenAI on how to fake the evidence.
From ChatGPT or like from Bobby the intern?
The former.
There's definitely a concept of a plan... to get started planning... Or is that health care? We're two weeks away from a plan!
load more comments
(3 replies)
Let him cook. This is how we learn about the exact details of how Trump fixed the 2024 election
Are we still talking about the 2020 election, it's the 2000 election we should talk about, or maybe the 1980 one.
load more comments
(4 replies)
Patel – who was hit by allegations of alcoholism this weekend, sparking rumors he could soon be fired – told Maria Bartiromo on Fox News’s Sunday Morning Futures: “We have the information that backs President Trump’s claim.
Dusting off one of the greatest hits for yet, ANOTHER distraction.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Under pressure, but what about under oath?
He's already lied under oath (e.g. about how many times Trump is mentioned in the Epstein Files). Him being depositioned wouldn't mean squat.
I would buy that there is evidence that the Republicans attempted to steal the election.
Sure buddy, let's see the files on those hanging chads in Florida while you're at it, Bush lost too, you fucking losers.
load more comments
(2 replies)
view more: next ›