this post was submitted on 01 May 2026
756 points (98.7% liked)

Fuck Cars

15667 readers
533 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 24 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Here in Canada we have more former abandoned rail then active rail lines. And around where I am people are fighting to stop the old rail lines being used as biking and walking trails. YAY

[–] knexcar@lemmy.world 6 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I feel like many people oppose rails to trails because then there’s much less of a chance it will become rails again, so you have to let go of the hope of any sort of trains coming back. Though becoming a trail is certainly a lot better than the track land being split up and sold off to developers, since then there’s no chance.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 4 points 21 hours ago

Yeah, that is not at all the case here. There is no new passenger rail even as a dream and these rails used to be everywhere. We are talking about at least 40 years since a train was ever down these lines, and they have sat there doing nothing this whole time.

[–] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why ? that can't be dangerous if no trains are running

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 9 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Land owners have gotten used to just using the land for free, and they don't want people near their land and other self serving things.

[–] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 4 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

oh, ok. Landowner things I guess

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 4 points 18 hours ago

Asshole landowner things yes.

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Funny thing, the UK we had the opposite problem, people fighting to stop the reopening of lines that have become walking and biking trails (usually for freight train profit)

We also converted many of our local innercity lines into into ELR, which is slower but it's also cheaper and they're all loop lines with a schedule of 1 every 5-10 minutes

[–] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I live in Jersey, and we have tons of them. And fortunately they are turning some into pedestrian paths, rails-to-trails style, but we have literal (albeit old) infrastructure for rail lines between places that are only accessible via rail by going to Newark, changing, and hopping on a different line. We're talking hours for a 30 mile ride.

I need me some eminent domain. There's some major hubs west of Newark that you can only drive between.

But yeah, seeing them turned into trails is at least better than nothing. But I want moooorrreee.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 3 points 1 day ago

There are some trail networks in the eastern provances that allow people to go snowmobiling for weeks at a time on groomed trails (former rail lines) and I have known people that is what they did for their vacation each year, stopping in at all the small towns on the way.