this post was submitted on 03 May 2026
118 points (97.6% liked)

Fuck Cars

15699 readers
507 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Samskara@sh.itjust.works 15 points 4 days ago (4 children)

instead, every two weeks, she buys at least $35 worth of groceries online to avoid a $6.99 fee for a smaller order and pays a $7 monthly delivery charge not covered by her Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (Snap) benefits.

[–] Toto@lemmy.world 16 points 4 days ago
[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

$35 of groceries is 4 to 8 meals, not to mention hygiene and household items. One person would spend much more than that weekly if they're not dining out.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

if they’re not dining out.

Or are hungry.

[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

$35 is a lot of oatmeal, bread, potatoes, pasta, rice, beans, and frozen veg. Maybe some raisins for fruit. No, it’s not fun, but you eat miserable food when you live in a food desert and have no money. Also, the passage says at least, not only. She’s probably spending more.

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

She’s probably spending more

that's my point, spending $35 to avoid the extra fee is not really a problem, because one can easily do that with everyday food for one person per week. In fact it'd be really hard to spend less than that on food.

[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 days ago

spending $35 to avoid the extra fee is not really a problem

If it’s making it so that she can only order groceries every 2 weeks, I’d consider that a problem. The fee itself isn’t the root cause, but it’s another barrier. I don’t believe for a second that your quality of life wouldn’t be impacted if you only ordered groceries every 2 weeks.

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

That’s Walmart. And their competitor to Amazon Prime.

[–] CannedYeet@lemmy.world -1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Is that supposed to sound bad? That doesn't sound bad to me.

[–] athatet@lemmy.zip 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It’s not “supposed to sound bad” It IS bad.

[–] CannedYeet@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

$7 a month is $3.50 per delivery. That's like the cost of a round trip bus ticket. And someone is spending the time and effort shopping for you. And $35 is not a burdensome minimum for 2 weeks of groceries.

To steelman the article, the real cost comes in with the fact they sneak in markups on the prices of the items.

[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

And $35 is not a burdensome minimum for 2 weeks of groceries.

It doesn’t say she only spends $35, it says $35 is the minimum she has to spend to avoid the charge.

[–] CannedYeet@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yes, I understand. You misunderstood me just now. If anyone else misunderstood my previous comment, please downvote this so I know.