this post was submitted on 04 May 2026
278 points (93.4% liked)
Technology
84359 readers
4311 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The place I work at I wouldn't say is "over staffed" but it is maybe "wrong-staffed".
They have a full time "scrum master" and from what I can tell all she does it share her screen so people can awkwardly tell her which tickets to click on, and she calls on people in order during the morning meeting. That's a whole-ass job. Meanwhile, devops is like crying blood because there's like 2 of them managing decades of systems, and no senior engineering roles have been backfilled after people left for years.
Do you work for the same company I do. We just laid off our senior dev ops manager and moved the team to our India office.
That's it? She's not involved in planning or anything? Even when I was a dev scrum leader, we'd plan out every sprint as well longer term planning. It was surprisingly time consuming and we had to budget less dev time for me so I could handle the scrum duties.
Glad I didn't have to do that shit anymore.
Not in any way I can discern! She's in the planning meetings but her entire role seems to be sharing her screen so people can tell her what to click on. (This is excruciating to witness. It is so slow.)
Sometimes she'll say "remember to check your capacity!", but two other people on the team say that too.
She seems to be entirely non-technical, too, so she doesn't have much input on any of the discussion. The inter-team stuff is handled by two other people. (A lady of importance whose title I don't know, and some sort of business analyst)
Very similar issue here... Scrum masters that invite themselves to every meeting to run them, but are not able to contribute meaningfully in any way. I guess it's not just my company that does agile wrong
Typical Scrumbags
I'm fortunate to have an effective scrum master. She knows the products will enough to properly interface with our different stage holders. The amount of shit that doesn't make it to us because she's essentially our firewall to the customers, is astounding.
That said, there are plenty of other business decisions being made that are rapidly leading to a team wide brain drain. The top brass is so out of touch with reality, and they make major decisions on that ignorance without consulting anyone that knows anything. It's also turned into a boys club at the top, so there's no individual accountability, just yes men.
I mean, without knowing the details what your scrum master does, that feels more like a 'product owner' role to me.
But to be fair, I'm also not sure, what the 'scrum master' role is actually supposed to do. Some say, scrum masters really need to be deeply involved in the whole project to be able to question/assist the way of working.
And then there's the reality at my company, which is that scrum masters often have 10+ projects, where they just hop between meetings to host them, while hardly being able to contribute anything...
Lol that's not what a scrum masters job is at your company