this post was submitted on 09 May 2026
863 points (98.3% liked)

Science Memes

20263 readers
707 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 90 points 1 week ago (3 children)

LEGO has technically lowered prices. They have started transitioning to sustainable plastic sources that are much more expensive to produce, but will not increase prices.

[–] Bluegrass_Addict@lemmy.ca 40 points 1 week ago (3 children)

just means they were overpriced to begin with.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 56 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Yes, but now that they're built from better and more expensive materials without a price raise, they're less overpriced than they used to be.

Hell, name any other toy brand with anywhere near their popularity and brand recognition which HASN'T been overpriced forever AND raised prices significantly in recent years.

[–] HoopyFrood@lemmy.zip 33 points 1 week ago

On top of that the general price increase over the last 25 years has come with considerable increases in set intricacy, piece count, and variety to both piece shapes and themes. I love to dunk on corporate price gouging but i really struggle to fault LEGO. I personally use “a person can comfortably buy LEGO as toys for their children” as my personal litmus for what a good wage should be; they’re pretty solid for maintaining a price/value ratio and Americans should all be making at least 150k/year by now even out in the boonies, just deduct it right out of the fortune 500s margins

[–] Bluegrass_Addict@lemmy.ca -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

my point, is I won't give companies a shred of recognition of a 'good job' until their crimes, lies and corruption are stopped or they are jailed. no more free passes, no more looking the other way, no more 'well it's kinda better now' .. no. hard stop, I'm sick of all these companies. they all deserve nonstop hatred, being called out for crimes and being treated like trash.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What crimes have LEGO committed?

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml -5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Instead of paying workers what they are worth, they are paid a market wage that is always less than the value they produce.

That's where profit comes from. All profit is theft.

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Profit can also be the value of the labour you put into something. If you buy wood, build a table, then sell it for more than the value of the wood, then that profit is the value of your labour.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml -4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

No. Profit is revenue in excess of costs, yes, but the cost of building a table isn't merely the cost of the materials. Costs also include the time and effort spent building the table, the time and effort spent learning to build tables, the cost of acquiring tools with which to build, the cost of having a space in which to build, and the cost of finding customers to buy the table.

When you factor these other costs in to the table, the builder breaks even. Yes, even if they end up with more money than with which they started. They simply exchanged their time and effort for money, but they can never get that time back can they?

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago

Most people would understand "profit" to mean the net flow of money, not value. If you redefine it this way, then you can no longer look at the "profit" line of a company's sheets and say that they're stealing because the number is positive.

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago

Lego sells a physical toy in 2026, not a game, and is still running.

They are not stupid. They will not rock this boat with a price increase.

[–] Venat0r@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

or they get to write off some tax as a result of switching to the sustainable plastic, so it doesn't actually cost them anything to switch.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

This is treating it as if they're being nice. No. They just priced it at the maximum amount the market would allow. If they raised it further it'd cost them far too much in sales. Them increasing costs (assuming it actually does, and they don't get a tax write-off that counters it or something) has no relation to price.