this post was submitted on 22 May 2026
451 points (98.7% liked)

Programmer Humor

31537 readers
2483 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Feyter@programming.dev
anzo@programming.dev
BurningTurtle@programming.dev
pylapp@programming.dev
451
Accepting Cookies (suppo.fi)
submitted 1 day ago by FoxtrotDeltaTango@sh.itjust.works to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev
31 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cross-posted from: https://suppo.fi/post/12337562

fixed

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 61 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It can hide the popup but all the rapist advertising companies take that as yes because you didn't say no.

Use consent-o-matic to automatically opt out.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Doesn't matter if I opt in or out if I just delete them all on closing the browser and they all disappear.

[–] 18107@aussie.zone 5 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Cookie AutoDelete for Firefox and Chrome.

Source

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 3 points 15 hours ago

Firefox can be set to delete them when the browser closes without plugins

[–] SwooshBakery624@programming.dev 4 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Don't do that.

Cookie extensions

❗️Sanitizing in-session is a false sense of privacy. They do nothing for IP tracking. Even Tor Browser does not sanitize in-session e.g. when you request a new circuit. A new ID requires both full sanitizing and a new IP. The same applies to Firefox

❗️Cookie extensions can lack APIs or implementation of them to properly sanitize: e.g.

⚠️ [last checked Nov 2024], Cookie Auto Delete even instructs it's users to disable Total Cookie Protection - ⚠️ DO NOT DO THIS ⚠️

As of Firefox 86, strict mode is not supported at this time due to missing APIs to handle the Total Cookie Protection [... followed by instructions]

https://github.com/arkenfox/user.js/wiki/4.1-Extensions

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

"don't lock your door, it does not prevent scammers from getting your home address"

???

yeah, we know deleting cookies doesn't prevent IP tracking, that's also why I use a VPN

[–] pr3d@eviltoast.org 4 points 13 hours ago

I don't get it. Of course it doesn't help with IP tracking of fingerprinting, but it deletes all cookies when I leave a site. My browsers runs very long on desktop and mobile, so Firefox's 'Delete cookies on close' doesn't help much.

[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Is that needed if ublock already stops all the tracking scripts from loading?

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes. Because cookies are used for tracking and can be set without the aid of Javascript.

For anyone interested, cookies pre-date Javascript and are baked in the HTTP protocol by way of a Set-Cookie header that the browser responds to by storing whatever information accompanies the Set-Cookie header; usually a unique id that can then be used to track what pages on a domain you visit.

[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

uMatrix once again to the rescue. It can block cookies. The only downside to uMatrix is that it dis-/allows based on su domain, so you can't accept a log-in cookie and reject the tracking cookie, if they are served by the same subdomain.