this post was submitted on 22 May 2026
324 points (99.7% liked)

politics

29844 readers
2681 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works -1 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Happy to fill my brain with this good news if you can provide any source

Makes a declaration with no substance, is refuted, asks for a source.

What's your .ml/hexbear account?

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

What’s your .ml/hexbear account?

This isn't a Tankie. They're a TurboLib.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago
[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Tankies aren't into electoralism

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 1 points 12 hours ago

Honestly, I'm sort of just angry at .mlers so I didn't even really think here — I just accused.

I should probably reign in my stigma towards them, it isn't productive. Thanks.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world -2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Buddy, you claimed, with no source, that there are protests twice a month. I am giving you the benefit of the doubt but would like some evidence of your claim

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 0 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

No, no — see you made the declaration that no protests are happening. Do you understand what the burden of proof means? You made the declaration, they refuted it using 0 sources because you didn't provide any sources for your claims.

Because you don't have any.

Edit: oh, I looked into the protests they mentioned — they're absolutely happening, so not only do they not need to provide sources because you are arguing in bad faith, they don't need to because what they're saying is true.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 0 points 13 hours ago

... and again no evidence of these biweekly protests that are totally happening