this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2026
151 points (96.3% liked)

Enshittification

4952 readers
275 users here now

What is enshittification?

The phenomenon of online platforms gradually degrading the quality of their services, often by promoting advertisements and sponsored content, in order to increase profits. (Cory Doctorow, 2022, extracted from Wikitionary) source

The lifecycle of Big Internet

We discuss how predatory big tech platforms live and die by luring people in and then decaying for profit.

Embrace, extend and extinguish

We also discuss how naturally open technologies like the Fediverse can be susceptible to corporate takeovers, rugpulls and subsequent enshittification.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I know it's quite an insignificant bit of enshittification but I still feel a bit miffed that every logo these days looks the same.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 7 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I hope you're right but I'm not sure it's really as set in stone as you make it sound.

[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Its a pretty well documented phenomena

Generation A does something a certain way

Generation B rejects their parents' taste, does the thing a different way

Generation C goes "there was some good stuff back in A's day, maybe we shouldn't write them off completely" and boom we're wearing bell bottoms in the 90s

[–] lol_idk@piefed.social 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Why do we still have mom jeans then, no one looks good in them

[–] deacon@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

We don’t still have mom jeans. We have mom jeans again, supporting kobold’s point.

[–] lol_idk@piefed.social 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)
[–] deacon@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

They are called mom jeans because - because - until recently, and since the early nineties, only moms wore them. Not sure about you but where I come from, “mom” is not synonymous with fashionable.

Nothing goes away. Things go in and out of fashion and the zeitgeist - that’s really what is being discussed here.

[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not sure it's really applicable here. What I'm seeing in this picture is not an evolution from "Style A" to "Style B", it's more like an evolution from lots of diverse logos to a completely uniform design across the industry. It's not an evolution from one style to another, but more like a consolidation from unique logos to sameness.

I have a hard time seeing them diversifying again. Maybe someone will change but then the others might just follow suite.

[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

Until eventually enough execs get tired of it and demand busier logos because itll catch attention