RT*** isn't pointing at RT*, he's pointing at the TV showing RT**. The fact you think otherwise is what makes the image unclear. I'm not sure why you insist on them being wrong.

[–] _tasten_tiger@feddit.org 0 points 19 hours ago

But that doesn't hold up, because RT** isn't pointing at a TV containing RT* only RT*** is pointing at an TV containing RT** RT* and RT

[–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 days ago

int** is inside a TV, and persumably int* must be inside another TV(even though uts not edited in). The image perespective is showing one thing inside the other, inside the other. So when when int*** points the TV it reference int**, which reference int* which reference int. Its just edited very bad

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

What's the * for again?

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

That one's a typo

[–] Monument@piefed.world 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

It’s to check to see if commenters know how to escape the symbol. Congratulations! You passed!

Source: I made it up.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

You don't need to escape standalone *. At least not on Lemmy.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago

You can't escape it, it will always get you.

[–] Monument@piefed.world 3 points 2 days ago

Well, I thought my misinformation was funny.