this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2026
154 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

85376 readers
3836 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The modern automobile is safer, cleaner, more efficient, and more technologically advanced than anything that came before it. Yet those improvements have come at a cost. For many owners, mechanics, and independent repair shops, that cost is repairability.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Johanno@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

You agree when you use the car.

At least that is the legal claim.

There is a disclaimer when you start the car.

[–] vrek@programming.dev 17 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Wait... Every car I ever rented, borrowed or owned never showed a disclaimer anywhere. What are you driving that shows a disclaimer?

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I'd check owners manuals, and any rental policies, or bill of sale/contracts. Sometimes this may show up when the vehicle is first taken out of pre-delivery mode and never again.

[–] vrek@programming.dev 6 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

If it's only at pre-delivery or in manual, then I buy the car second hand without a manual am I still legally complied to the disclaimer?

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 54 minutes ago)

Not a lawyer. No idea, but possibly. Seems like it would be covered by some sort of clause about taking on those risks and responsibilities if you ride in or drive the car but how enforceable is that?

[–] Changelin@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

What choice do consumers have, anyway? Return the car cause you don't agree with the disclaimer?

[–] Venator@lemmy.nz 11 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

and then what are you gonna buy instead, a second hand car from the mid 90s before they all started adding telemetry modules.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 14 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I did literally that.

The real solution is regulatory, though, because obviously my boycott has done absolutely fuck-all to change manufacturer behavior.

[–] Venator@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

yeah they know most people don't know or don't care, maybe selling the data from the telemetry to a data broker who on sells it to ICE might change some peoples minds...

Or if ICE starts connecting to the telemetry modules directly on older less secure models...