this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2026
80 points (97.6% liked)

Not The Onion

21749 readers
1303 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Elections chief says bid by ex-teacher to challenge senator with same name was filed ‘to confuse or mislead’ voters

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 54 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

That feels illegal. You can't enter the race just because you share a name with someone else?

[–] Carmakazi@piefed.social 23 points 20 hours ago

If they can paint a picture that it was not a sincere and genuine campaign and was in fact a ploy to pull votes away from the real candidate, sure.

[–] Zak@lemmy.world 15 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Candidates typically use a distinct version of the name in that case, such as "Daniel" instead of "Dan", or with a distinct middle initial included. A serious candidate does not usually want to be confused with their opponent.

[–] baronvonj@piefed.social 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

They usually have the nominating party listed for each candidate, too.

[–] kn33@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

In this case, both would be "Dan Sullivan (R)"

The way this race lists them, it's based on what party the candidate proclaims themselves to be.

[–] baronvonj@piefed.social 3 points 17 hours ago

Oh this is for a primary election. Still a stupid decision by the chief.

[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 10 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Republicans have purposely run someone (as an independent) with the same name as the Democrat in the past, hoping to peel off dumb voters. Fooling a couple hundred can be all it takes sometimes.