this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2026
293 points (97.7% liked)

Games

49039 readers
2048 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] early_riser@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

This is why I hate Lemmy sometimes. "It's wrong to wish people dead, except for 'them'. 'They' are fare game." It's the same BS we've been doing for the whole history of our miserable species.

[–] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

It’s wrong to wish people dead

I had this attitude 20 years ago. I no longer do. I've come to realize that there are certain rich fucks who are actively harming humanity directly (Hitler, Kissinger, Reagan, world leaders who send the poor to useless wars), and if they died and their death prevented more suffering, that's a good thing for humanity. Even the rich fucks that just hoard money are actively robbing from the poor to do so, and some of those people die as a result.

How many people does a person have to kill before they are too far gone to save, and are just evil? How many levels of indirection does it take before they wouldn't be considered evil? What happens if a person indirectly kills millions of people? Is that still far enough to call them evil?

These are the questions you should ask yourself when you try to plot out your own moral compass.

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works -1 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

certain rich fucks who are actively harming humanity directly (Hitler, Kissinger, Reagan, world leaders who send the poor to useless wars

Ok, so which of those examples was this guy most like? Lol

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 10 hours ago

Keep reading the comment you dolt

[–] grinning_serpent@lemmy.world 11 points 19 hours ago

The wealth hoarders immediately after that part you quoted.

[–] scutiger@lemmy.world 46 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Meh, I don't wish death on anyone, but that doesn't mean I have to be sad that a shitty person died.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 10 hours ago

Meh, I don't wish death on anyone

10 years ago (maybe even 5), I would have agreed with you.

I'm past that shit. There are people that I now 100% wish would do humanity a favor and kill themselves.

[–] Aatube@piefed.social 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Nobody's criticizing people for not being sad. There's a word for this, "gloating".

[–] scutiger@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I still think that's fine. Sometimes the world is better off when someone dies.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago
[–] baines@lemmy.cafe 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

this isn't complicated

the social contract basically boils down to, you at a baseline do right by me and in return I do the same for you

assholes like this and other rich fucks try to game this system for profit by literally harming parts of our lives via loopholes

when ass fucks say lets hurt person ‘insert something that has no impact on anything’ like skin color or sexuality that is wrong

when people talk about wishing death on people that are literally fucking with our lives it should obviously not be the same

whether tanking a video game falls into that bucket is nuanced but people like the united health fuck are easily fair game

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Wait, why do you hate lemmy for this? I think who you actually hate are humans. Reddit and all the other modern social media platforms have the same issues, because they too have humans.

[–] placebo@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago

I wouldn't be surprised if many of these people are, in fact, banned on reddit because of this behavior.

[–] Summzashi@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Lemmy seems waaaay more negative in general though. It's actually kinda jarring being here sometimes.

[–] grinning_serpent@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Because most of us got banned on Reddit for speaking out.

I guess I have to tolerate limpdicked equivocation and "let's all be sad some rich asshole carked it" on reddit but why here? Those spineless losers can fuck off back to reddit.

[–] Summzashi@lemmy.world 6 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Definitely not just talking about subjects like this.

[–] early_riser@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes, but this is just the cherry on top of a steaming turd sundae of other issues I have with Lemmy that I won't rehash again here. It's not like my complaining will change anything anyway.

Compare these reactions to the Ubisoft subreddit, which granted are going to skew fanward. On /r/games the conversation seems to be mixed, with a few dancing on his grave, most expressing dismay at his death while still acknowledging the harm he did to the company and industry as a whole. Plenty of people are simply discussing the dangers of small aircraft.

[–] eleijeep@piefed.social 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

nowhere is perfect, but some places are better than others.

[–] early_riser@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because I like the idea of Lemmy and the fediverse, so I hang on despite its issues.

[–] baines@lemmy.cafe 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

if you can burry your head in the sand enough to be upset about people celebrating the death of rich fuck wads in 2026 just put said head back in the ground

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (3 children)

That pretty much nails my feelings. Charlie Kirk is a huge piece of shit and I'm glad he died honestly. But I'd be a worse person if I made a personality out of mocking him for being dead. Can't we just take the win? Fate decided a bad person was over. I wish that could be that.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Who here is making this into their personality? It's the pearl clutchers here who are making this far bigger than it is.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world -1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

People are still posting gleeful shit about his death. I don't care what anyone says, that's unhealthy.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Before 2016 (and to an even greater degree, 2025), I would never have wished death on another person. However, the last ten years have been very eye opening for me. There are people whose continued existence on this mortal plane is the direct cause of untold hatred, suffering, and death (all unnecessary).

Humanity, and quite literally the planet itself, would be much better off with them dead. And, in fact, their continued existence is a direct threat to all life on this planet.

Whether or not it's healthy is a separate question. I can't say I'm super happy about it. But it is what it is.

Yes, there are degrees and this Ubisoft guy isn't on the same level as, say, Trump or Stephen Miller. But they are both cancers on humanity, maybe just different "stages."

[–] baines@lemmy.cafe 8 points 1 day ago

good things should be celebrated

things that improve the general state of humanity are generally considered good

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 0 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Charlie Kirk was okay with people dying from gun violence if it meant fewer restrictions on guns. He fought against minority groups' rights. He was spreading dangerous rhetoric worldwide.

The Ubisoft guy helped found a popular video game company and was probably just a generic rich prick at worst.

The world is better off without Charlie Kirk. I doubt the world, let alone the video game industry, let alone even just Ubisoft, will get any better after today thanks to Guillemot's death.

There's a huge difference here.

[–] grinning_serpent@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

I mean, yeah, Kirk was unquestionably the bigger turd but I'm happy both are gone. They're all part of the same overarching issue with this world.

Them just fixing their shit would be greatly preferable. But they wouldn't be part of the problem for very long if they were capable of that kind of introspection.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 0 points 14 hours ago

The point is was making had nothing to do with Charlie Kirk other than he was an example of people being gleeful about a death. Which is unhealthy.