this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2026
291 points (95.3% liked)

Technology

85791 readers
4163 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Realistically we should be taxing by weight and miles driven as the former causes the most damage to the roads. At that point the propulsion type and efficiency don’t really matter. EVs actually would be taxed more given that they’re heavier, but it’d also proportionately tax trucks and larger vehicles correctly at that point.

You could easily implement it with a yearly odometer reading with your registration or inspection and every car has a GVWR registered with it.

[–] myrrh@ttrpg.network 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

...vehicle registration taxes should be based upon ton-miles driven and speed limits should be based upon kinetic energy...

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Yes that would be fair, but IMO there should be an environment tax on gas.

[–] GreenBeard@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

How about just metering charging infrastructure and taxing by the kilowatt hr? Power consumed is directly proportional to the weight, distance, and rate of travel. A simple mandate that all home charging stations have to have a wireless or remote-readable meter attached, and all public fast-chargers are taxed by KWh. Easy, simple, and nearly frictionless.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

No, that doesn’t work. You can charge anywhere.

If you watch that “Technology Connections” video that keeps going around Lemmy, you should not waste your money on a home charging station

  • technically you can charge at a standard outlet. It works for some people
  • I also have adapters for tool outlets, dryer outlets, rv outlets (a dryer outlet could charge as quickly as the charging stations where I work)

A home charging station is just a convenience. A really nice convenience that I highly recommend, but unnecessary

Power consumed is directly proportional to the weight, distance, and rate of travel

And if we’re trying to be fair, that’s really not true either. There’s a wide range of efficiencies for different vehicles. On the extreme end, if Aptera succeeds, those drivers would pay nothing. More importantly, this also gives them another opportunity to charge unfairly to defend ICE vehicles

Simple weight and miles, regardless of technology and efficiency, and recorded at annual inspection or purchase/sale - ideally also keep the gas tax to help pay for its impact on the environment

[–] GreenBeard@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As far as the variety of efficiencies, I don't see that as a downside. That just incentivizes higher efficiency systems if you assume the median efficiency for tax purposes.

That said you do make a valid point about non-standard charging set ups. I'm not entirely opposed to the odometer method, I just find most proposals for implementing it a barrier to adoption.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

It’s already illegal to modify the odometer and many states have annual safety inspections where they could record such things

The strongest arguments against smreridinf the odometer are surveillance and safety react, but if you’re only recording it once a year or when sold, then you’re not losing privacy