this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2023
96 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37604 readers
136 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

NYT gift article expires in 30 days.

https://ghostarchive.org/archive/oA7zq

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 154 points 1 year ago (8 children)

We built a country with almost no public transportation, made it extremely car oriented, have actively pushed against bike lanes, and now parents are wondering why e-bikes aren't very safe. They're not even the best alternative, it's just in this weird car-centric society we built they're the only alternative.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] thejevans@lemmy.ml 38 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's worth noting that the top picture in the article is of a kid on a $4400 Sur-ron X, which is strictly not road legal and is capable of up to 45mph and can accelerate to 30mph in 3.5 seconds.

[–] tim-clark@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Anything over a class 2 should be licensed and require insurance. In the US if you are traveling faster than 12mph you are required to follow traffic laws. Some states even require vehicle insurance if there is an incident above 12mph.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 9 points 1 year ago

99% of the danger on roads is caused by motor vehicles. Once we’ve solved that problem we can have a conversation about whether licensing improves e-bike safety. But until that day, creating barriers to car alternatives directly makes people less safe. If you prevent teenage hooligans from biking, they will drive instead and will be an actual danger to people instead of this imagined one.

[–] abhibeckert@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You think teenagers care about insurance? Even if they did, they certainly can't buy any.

I'm pretty sure the teens my neighbourhood that go as fast as they can at night on the wrong side of the road around blind corners with their lights turned off are uninsured. I love my eBike. Not a fan of how I see other people riding them every day though (and not just kids).

[–] RickRussell_CA@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago

States have no licensing/registration infrastructure for bicycles. And any changes must happen state by state (c.f. the chaos that is motorcycle registration).

[–] tunetardis@lemmy.ca 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think the pros outweigh the cons? Anything that steers us away from car culture is desperately needed at this point, and this is one of the only practical alternatives in suburbia.

I would be for bike safety being taught at schools, though I feel licensing for minors would be a quagmire? Let's not go there. I would be for speed limiters that are harder to bypass. For example, I can disable mine by phone app. If I had any trouble I could ask, well, a teenager? lol

But perhaps most importantly, cycling infrastructure, at least in North America, is a joke and there is so much that can be done on the safety front it's not funny. I wish the decision makers were all bike commuters. Then they would understand the level of impracticality in their well-meaning but futile attempts to improve the situation.

[–] dataJam@feddit.de 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This basically sounds like the regulation in Germany. Bike safety is being taught at schools, and there is a discrete distinction between e-bikes and Pedelecs. Pedelecs, which only support while pedalling, are legally bicycles with a speed limit of 25 km/h (15 mp/h). Everything above this limit or with the capability to drive without pedalling are called E-Bikes and need insurance and some sort of license.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 25 points 1 year ago

Bike roads are pretty safe so better than metal coffins going 130km/h... ohh right this is america there arent any bike paths.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.one 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I was going to say, when I was a kid, growing up in the 70s, I had a dirt bike with a spedometer and I regularly pushed that thing to 25mph just with the pedals.

My first thought was "faster than 20? No big deal..."

But then I hit this:

"in fact, the Talaria can hit 70 miles per hour. His mother gave him her blessing, she said, and even helped him clip a wire that removes the speed “governor” that ordinarily limits the vehicle to 20 miles per hour."

Having an eBike that can go that fast with relatively no modification at all does not seem wise to me, and it's irresponsible of the parent to assist in that.

1 year after graduation, one of my high school friends got into an argument with his girlfriend, was riding his motorcycle too fast without a helmet, and crashed straight into the back of a garbage truck, killing him instantly.

A bike helmet wouldn't have helped, maybe a DOT approved motorcycle helmet would have.

Edit I looked up the mod, it brings the bike to 70Kph, not mph. So about 45. Still faster than I'd want my kid going.

[–] Smoke@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

FWIW, I used to have an ebike that went up to 70, as an adult, that I used to commute to work and do shopping. New regulations came in restricting all new ebikes to 25 km/h, and now a shopping run takes an hour one-way.

[–] Peaces@infosec.pub 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How long did it take before?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] diskmaster23@lemmy.one 22 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Since North America is poorly designed, it isn't a good thing. If North America was better designed then biking and walking would be safer. #NotJustBikes

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] danknodes@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I swear these technology subs really are anti-technology, it's all old-man-yells-at-cloud whining and complaining. What a joke.

[–] wahming@monyet.cc 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Who's complaining in here?

[–] snooggums@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SaltySalamander@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Please kindly point to the whining and complaining.

[–] mashbooq@infosec.pub 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FARTYSHARTBLAST@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Freedom is inherently dangerous, so, yes. We accept the risk of course because not being free is fucking terrible.

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@startrek.website 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Freedom is inherently dangerous

Only to a degree. Letting your child run free on a playground is significantly less dangerous than letting them run free in a hazardous waste landfill. We can absolutely design safe and free places. We just need to stop designing our cities for the sole use of hazardous waste (cars).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gerryflap@feddit.nl 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This article is obviously from an American perspective, in which case e-bikes are probably a necessary evil to give kids more freedom. But from the Dutch perspective I'm certainly a bit scared about them. I see more and more kids racing through the streets on those things. These kids often used to go by bike anyway, but their speed was still limited by their physical ability. Now they have to put in less energy, meaning they'll gain weight, and they're also going way too fast with a heavier bike that they don't fuly control. It's led to plenty of dangerous situations already. People obviously aren't forced to buy an e-bike, but the kids without one often have a bit of a problem when they have to cycle 10km every day with friends who do have one. So it becomes a domino effect where we end up in a worse situation than before.

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Especially in the Netherlands, better to have those escooters than to have actual scooters which make tons of noise and blow exhaust fumes to any biker that drives behind them.

[–] gerryflap@feddit.nl 4 points 1 year ago

Oh yeah for scooters it's better. But for bikes it's only better if it leads to someone using a bike where they otherwise could not. Otherwise it makes stuff more dangerous and expensive and less healthy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] stagen@feddit.dk 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Denmark already have regulations that stipulate that ebikes and escooters can't go faster than 20kmt and i feel that's reasonable. For scooters you're also required by law to wear a helmet.

[–] noddy@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We have the same/similar regulations in norway as well. I don't have an e bike, but I guess the speed limit must be annoyingly low. I often pass them on my regular bike in like 30 km/h.

[–] stagen@feddit.dk 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I could be wrong and the speed limit is only for scooters but honestly I don’t care to look into it. I prefer my regular bike and until I’m old and incapable of using that I won’t change.

Edit: Learned a lot about this today. Cheers fellas for the replies!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Veraticus@lib.lgbt 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I love the idea of e-bikes, but I think people are acting dangerously on them. I think a modest amount of training and licensure -- at least to tell people to obey traffic laws, wear helmets, and not go 30 miles per hour on sidewalks or pedestrian zones -- would respect freedom while removing a lot of danger.

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@startrek.website 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

We are at a point in time in which we can't afford to wait any longer to switch away from fossil fuels, and e-bikes are one of the ways to do so. The barriers to entry should be minimal.

The majority of e-bike injuries are to the rider themselves, and due to inattention/falling off. That's not something that training or a license will really help with. Speeding and not wearing a helmet on the other hand, those are things easier to catch/deal with.

[–] Veraticus@lib.lgbt 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think safety courses and licensing are a huge barrier to entry though, unless we let them be. And on the other hand the safety benefits seem to be enormous.

And yes, training and a license would indeed make a difference with how riders conduct themselves. Including wearing a helmet or paying attention.

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@startrek.website 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don’t think safety courses and licensing are a huge barrier to entry though, unless we let them be.

Training and licenses generally aren't free, and e-bikes are already pretty expensive. It would add quite enough of a barrier to entry to dissuade more people from switching to them, which is something the environment cannot afford. We honestly need to be doing everything in our power as quickly as possible.

And yes, training and a license would indeed make a difference with how riders conduct themselves. Including wearing a helmet or paying attention.

I've seen plenty of car drivers on the road who presumably have a license, yet they don't wear seat-belts, don't pay attention, turn in places they shouldn't, speed, etc. The first step should be infrastructure changes to increase the number of protected/dedicated bike trails (which in turn allow accidents to happen safely), built in speed limiters, rules on helmets and speed, mixed use zoning to reduce trip count/speed/cars, etc. Such changes don't have an impact on barrier to entry or and only a negligible effect on our freedom.

Traveling by bike is one of the few ways you can travel without having the government involved in some way, or at least minimally involved. I'd like it to stay that way.

And like I said earlier, most of these injuries are to the rider themselves, which means they were probably doing something stupid in the first place. People are going to be stupid even with a license and training, so we may as well design around it as a first step.


I have a cat. It likes to get into things I don't want it to. I could theoretically teach it not to do so, but the far simpler option is to keep the layout of my house and my things such that it can't get into things in the first place. If I keep the closet doors shut, it isn't getting in. People are stupid, and similarly, we should design our infrastructure to account for that. It's why speed bumps exist after all.

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 year ago

It's a culture issue, too.

Cyclist etiquette is not a problem whatsoever in cities built for them.

But when they are introduced into a city without cycling infrastructure, or existing riders setting an example, there will be idiots testing the limits.

[–] snowbell@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think they would be a lot less issue if people wore gear more like motorcyclists, the only wearing a half helmet approach that most bicyclists go with only makes sense because pedaling a bike in full motorcycle gear is hell. People should be encouraged to wear much more extensive gear on an ebike.

[–] thejevans@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

100%. For reference, Virginia Tech rigorously tests bicycle helmets and rates them...based on 16mph impacts, and the recent NTA 8776 certification for ebike helmets has safety ratings based on 28mph impacts.

When I built a class 4 ebike years ago to replace the need for a car in an area with no bike infrastructure, limited public transit, and extremely limited pedestrian infrastructure, I used a full-face motorcycle helmet rated to ECE R22.05 spec. It saved me when a car cut me off and sent me flying. Proper safety gear is very important.

[–] Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Freedom. I fucking hate this shit where parents own their children. Fuck off with this. Genuinely one of the most awful aspecta of American life is having to live with and get to know your shitty boomer parents instead of getting drunk and having sex and dancing, like I assume european teens get to do, considering their age of consent and drinking ages are lower than ours.

[–] fushuan@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

instead of getting drunk and having sex and dancing, like I assume european teens get to do

Uh, yeah but actually no. You also need to hide it from your parents wtf. Also we do live with and get to know our parents until we get out of their home which with current prices the age is around 28-30ish right now?

[–] storksforlegs@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's safe if there's safe places to ride bikes? More bike lanes are needed everywhere, especially as cars get more and more out of reach for people.

Overall they are a very good thing.

(Maybe just ... do some public safety campaigns for sidewalk sharing etiquette haha)

[–] appel@whiskers.bim.boats 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

Why do perfectly healthy teenagers need electric bikes? I understand the case for less physically able to use ebikes, but why can't these kids just use regular bikes? Has everyone forgotten how to use their bodies?

Edit: carbrains have arrived

[–] dark_stang@beehaw.org 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hills exist, sometimes you need to go 20 miles, we have record setting temperatures every day, public transit sucks most places, and a lot of areas don't have bike lanes so you keep up with traffic or get ran over. E-bikes are good for everybody.

[–] Alto@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hills are the main reason I'd love an ebike. I bike pretty regularly, but I'm simply not capable of going 20+ up a big hill. I live in a ridiculously hilly area, trying to ride on the roads as is would be borderline suicidal

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@startrek.website 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

In addition to RiderExMachina's point, an e-bike will get you to your destination quicker, and with less effort. With how hot things are getting, it's much more preferable to not arrive sweaty as hell due to how much work it can take, plus it's better to spend less time in the heat.

[–] wahming@monyet.cc 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why do perfectly healthy adults need cars? Or regular bikes? Has everyone forgotten how to use their legs?

[–] Zorque@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago

People need to start pulling themselves across the ground like slugs, as god intended.

[–] tunetardis@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago

I am long since past my teen years, but as an avid traditional cyclist who is now an ebike enthusiast, here are a few points off the top of my head:

  • ebikes are consistently faster. It is easier to plan your day around ebike trips, since they take about the same amount of time every day. With a regular bike, your trip could be twice as long today because yesterday's tail wind has been replaced by a stiff head wind.
  • Issues involving extreme heat and poor air quality (in my experience, these often go hand-in-hand) have less impact on ebiking.
  • Terrain not being an impediment gives you more options. There may be some path you'd never have contemplated before since it is hilly or goes down into a deep ravine you will eventually have to slog your way out of, and so you'd wind up taking busy city streets instead with the danger that entails.
  • ebikes do give you exercise. You can usually control the amount of pedal assist or even turn it off for a real workout. When off, you will get more exercise than with a traditional bike since ebikes are heavier. But you can do this exercise wherever it is safest to do so and go electric when you need to move with traffic.
  • If your city has a main corridor for cycling in terms of say an off-road paved trail to downtown, but you'd have to go out of your way to an extent to reach it, you will be more likely to do so on an ebike. It is just not as much of bother to seek out the better and safer routes.
[–] donuts@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

I think you're being needlessly judgy, ebikes are great and it's never been about whether you "need" one or not.

They're faster than regular bikes, allowing you to cover a larger distance in the same amount of time, especially if you're fit. They're very fun to ride in general, and they can take some of the misery out of climbing hills or otherwise challenging/tedious parts of your commute. Cargo ebikes can carry a decent amount of stuff and even one or two small passengers in some cases, and in other cases they can replace your need for a car (like quickly getting to a store for something small). And they give you the ability to balance exercise vs convenience as the situation or your personalty demands (you get to decide how much work your body does and how much the motor does).

Finally, ebikes open the door for people to get into using active transportation instead of cars for people who normally wouldn't want to, whether they need help because of fitness, want help because of living in a hilly environment, or because they just want to get from point A to B in a reasonable amount of time. Riding my ebike in an urban environment, I find that I can actually get around just as fast as in a car, if not faster due to traffic.

Because I'm not super fit and live in a very unforgiving and hilly American neighborhood (where I also have to ride on curvy roads where people drive too damn fast) I would have never ever considered getting a regular bike. I'm now riding a bike somewhat regularly, getting a bit of exercise (or not, depending on the circumstances), and having a great time riding on roads, bike lanes, sidewalks, through parks (at a reasonable speed for pedestrians), etc.

Yes, they're more expensive than a regular bike.
Yes, they're heavier than a regular bike.
Yes, having to worry about battery charge is inconvenient.
Yes, it can be dangerous to ride any bike at >20mph.

But as the old saying goes "don't knock it until you try it". Even if you think you're a cycling purist, I recommend at least giving ebikes a try before judging others for using them. I think if you did you'd find that ebikes are an ally of and complement to normal bikes, and just like an electric guitar amplifies your strings, ebikes are amplifying your legs and not rendering them obsolete.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›