this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
522 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

59358 readers
5851 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Leaked Microsoft memo tells managers not to use budget cuts as an explainer for lack of pay rises: ‘Reinforce that every year offers unique opportunity for impact’::Managers are being ordered to dodge employees' questions about how the latest budget cuts will impact their pay.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] andrewrgross@slrpnk.net 210 points 1 year ago (5 children)

This is so backwards. I had to read this a few times to try to make sense of the memo. Apparently, the reasoning is that instead of telling employees that they didn't get a raise because of company-wide cuts, try to convince them that they just did a bad job?

That's stupid. That would obviously have the opposite effect of softening the disappointment. Whoever wrote this memo is an idiot who has no idea what employees do or what they think.

[–] evatronic@lemm.ee 98 points 1 year ago

It's only stupid if you think Microsoft wants to retain employees.

The tech industry is contracting after over expanding during the pandemic and, instead of layoffs, MS is hoping to get to their budget cuts by attrition.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 60 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yes, this is a tactic used by lots of the large software companies when they want to raise the bottom lines, and phase out an aging workforce because saying the word "layoffs" affects share price. It also helps to reduce the salary demands of any incoming workers to replace the outgoing, because the baseline gets reset without having to justify why profits are high, but workers won't be getting any of that (previous position at 75% premium, but incoming at 25% less than scale).

An example with Google in 2021-2022: tell all your middle-managers they'll need to do something unreasonable like relocate to keep their job, wait for some to leave, then put the rest on PIPs and promise their underlings they can apply for the soon-to-be vacant role if they keep up the good work. Effectively, Google only had to publicly acknowledge firing 12,000 employees, when closer to 20,000 were displaced for various reasons. It's a shitty shell game to keep the share price high, and force people who stick around to do more work for less money.

[–] Haui@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I might get sick. This is so disgusting I can’t even. Thanks for pointing that out. As an entrepreneur, I always try to make it worth everyones time. Seeing stuff like this just makes me sad.

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

As an entrepreneur, I always try to make it worth everyones time.

The "Win-Win" strategy is always the best strategy, long term.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

No companies will always frame any negative situation as the employees fault. It's gasslighting 101

[–] andrewrgross@slrpnk.net 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I just want to add that my brother had this happen today. He's a contractor at Aerojet Rocketdyne, and he asked his direct report whether they'll be renewing his contract next month. They said that they didn't know, because a high level manager who has never met him or likely seen any piece of his work is still assessing my brother's performance.

I pointed out that based on what he knows of the project and his role, he's fully qualified to answer this question: is it at all possible that they're invested in the success of the project, but think that letting him go and then starting a totally new contract hire search is going to make the project any less expensive or faster?

The answer is obvious. They might let him go because they lose interest in this wildly neglected project, but his performance is objectively nowhere near a level where replacing him would save time or money, and if they were serious this decision would've been made weeks ago. They clearly have no idea what they're doing next month and negging him while they try to figure out what the hell their goals are.

[–] ohlaph@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I would find a new contract and bounce at the end without notice.

[–] SCB@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

My company tanked last year and I ended up getting laid off, and as part of the process senior leadership owned the budget problems and in my layoff, I was given full pay for 16 weeks and uncontested unemployment (which I did not end up needing), as well as a job recommendation. Fortune 100 company.

Microsoft fucked up here and this manager memo is ridiculously stupid. This is how you hemorrhage the talent you're trying desperately to keep during budget shortfalls.

Companies aren't supervillains. They're just people, and people here fucked up.

[–] Eranziel@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Meanwhile the C-suite are getting record compensation and stock buybacks. There is no "budget shortfall", it's just typical greed at the top that's hoping the rank and file will swallow it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] silvercove@lemdro.id 18 points 1 year ago

Apparently, the reasoning is that instead of telling employees that they didn’t get a raise because of company-wide cuts, try to convince them that they just did a bad job?

This is what you do if you want to encourage attrition.

[–] Amazed@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

They want to neg their employees, sounds like.

[–] jtk@lemmy.sdf.org 120 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Every corp knows we're in late stage capitalism. They're not even trying to hide it anymore. Any individual that makes a billion dollars should be viewed as an enemy, even millionaires should be very nervous.

[–] Blastasaurus@lemm.ee 38 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What - you can't even buy a nice two-bedroom condo here for a million dollars, I think you need to re-evaluate what a millionaire is today.

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Buying a million dollar house and being a millionaire are two different things. Multi millionaires are part of the problem as well.

[–] PickTheStick@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I took it to mean people who earn that much per year. The average person working a $30k+ job should have more than a million in the bank at retirement, and that should have been enough to retire on comfortably. Now I'm being told it's more than 1.5-2 million dollars at retirement.

[–] Vent@lemm.ee 20 points 1 year ago

You pretty much need to be a multimillionaire to retire these days and it's not that hard to do with a half decent job and basic retirement planning, especially when factoring in a home to your net worth (which is standard). Millionaires are not the enemy. $1m is 1000x closer to $0 than $1B.

[–] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

What about us hundredaires?

[–] tony@lemmy.hoyle.me.uk 4 points 1 year ago

You have a positive balance? :o

[–] Marsupial@quokk.au 3 points 1 year ago

You’ll be given cushy jobs!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Zardoz@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago

'unique opportunity for impact'

Impact can't pay my fucking debt

[–] notannpc@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In other words “Leaked memo tells managers to lie”.

It’s not the lie that matters. It’s what the lie is.

I think most of us just assume lying is the standard from companies.

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago

Fuck Microsoft and Fuck Satya Nadella

[–] VicentAdultman@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago (2 children)

How did big tech companies got like these? Bigger cut for owners? I remember when a person got a job in Microsoft, Google, etc, it meant that they were financial stable in a good job that didn't drain all of their energy. We need tech more than ever now. Is it because there are so many devs these days? AI? All these things all together?

[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 33 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Free investor money ran out with the higher interest rates. The higher interest rates that were made to combat inflation, which again are mostly because of corporate greed.

Basically wages were going up, workers were getting a bigger slice of the pie against corporate profits - not that profits were dropping mind you, just not going up as fast as wages for a bit. So corporations as a block decided that the shock from supply chain distruptions means they get to raise prices. Somehow supply chain disruptions didn't show up on the bottom line though, so they got to make record profit, but we got record inflation. The gutted governments instead of taxing the windfall profits, because they can't do that because politics, were just watching as central banks increased interest rates that clobbered wages back.

It's just the system in action, when the 200 oligarchs holding the reins in America decide the workers of the "free world" have a bit too much, they crank up prices, which decreases wages even beyond the effect of said price increases.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

This is capitalism working as intended.

[–] Mojojojo1993@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago

Cunts. Same shit different day.

Rich get richer.

[–] Commiunism@lemmy.wtf 30 points 1 year ago

Literally carrot on a stick tactics

[–] Gazumi@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Men, many of you won't survive, but think of the glory! Hail Microsoft!!!!

[–] Biscuit303@reddthat.com 8 points 1 year ago

"You see, killbots have a preset kill limit. Knowing their weakness, I sent wave after wave of my own men at them until they reached their limit and shut down." - Captain Zap Brannigan

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Sorry, you're not getting a cost of living increase this year, but what you need to focus on is how impactful your work has been."

[–] zbyte64@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The reward is in thinking of all the money you're making us!

[–] some_designer_dude@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Please enjoy these photos of me and my family on the yacht you helped me afford. I hope the smiles on their faces bring you some warmth and joy inside your dank, overpriced basement apartment.

Keep up the good work!

[–] ArtVandelay@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Eat the fucking rich

[–] skymtf@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I kinda hate how it seems like programming will be at best a 30 per hour job in the future, likely leading to me needing two jobs. Its like I just graduated and I'm kinda frustrated with the state of this industry

[–] Sarcastik@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not to be too harsh, but welcome to the life of pretty much every other 4 year degree professional.

Cost of college keeps going up, while salary and career prospects continue to decline.

[–] skymtf@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah the working conditions are generally declining, it just sucks somehow the right is gonna say "WELL YOU SHOULD OF STUDIED A HIGH PAYING CAREER"

[–] zbyte64@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago

And they say degrowth can't happen. It's already happening if you're working class.

[–] skymtf@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 year ago

Not to mention back to the office bullshit will sooner or later force me to move somewhere with a 10X cost of living.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] thisisawayoflife@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

I wish I could have lived long enough to see Micro$oft go bankrupt and dissolve. They have brought nothing but toxicity to the tech community, and I've been in this game for almost 4 decades.

load more comments
view more: next ›