this post was submitted on 09 May 2024
286 points (98.3% liked)

News

22890 readers
3595 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world 140 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The government should never be allowed to put its own citizens to death. The government is not infallible. The government has put innocent people to death.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 73 points 4 months ago (16 children)

The same government can't even be trusted to reliably fix a pothole.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 84 points 4 months ago (19 children)

Regardless of the method of execution, imagine knowing the exact date and time of your death and knowing nothing you could do would stop it. That is torture, plain and simple. It should be in violation of the eighth amendment.

[–] Chozo@fedia.io 70 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Consider Japan, who does it differently. Death row inmates in Japan are not told their execution dates, as they had issues with people committing suicide before they could be executed. So now they only find out with just a few hours of notice when they're going to be executed. You could be sitting in your cell, ten years into your sentence, enjoying an otherwise ordinary, quiet day in prison, only to be told that it's time to die, whether you're ready for it or not, the equipment and staff are already prepared and there's no time left to argue your case.

Honestly, I don't know which one is "better". They're both cruel in their own ways.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 59 points 4 months ago

The better one is no death penalty at all.

[–] digdug@kbin.social 33 points 4 months ago (1 children)

"Good night, Westley. Good work. Sleep well. I'll most likely kill you in the morning."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PineRune@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It's been ruled that a punishment needs to be BOTH cruel AND unusual, to qualify as a violation. One or the other is fine, as long as it's not both. Scalping someone for petty theft would be okay as long as most-everyone convicted got scalped.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Or is it cruel to make someone wake up and ask "is this the day that I will die?"

[–] NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth 10 points 4 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 79 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I feel like if they fuck it up your sentence it should be commuted. They shouldn't get a do-over.

[–] Drusas@kbin.run 12 points 4 months ago (5 children)

It's not the case here, but fuckups tend to happen when the person is morbidly obese and therefore a vein can't be found.

Not making a point one way or another, just sharing a bit of information. This is a problem in the medical field as well.

[–] bleistift2@feddit.de 17 points 4 months ago (4 children)

I used to think people stay years on death row. Are you saying you can stay morbidly obese on prison food?

[–] pickman_model@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago

I believe that photograph is from 1999 when he got arrested. He was sentenced to death in 2000, so that's over 20 years waiting. And yes, obesity is becoming a problem inside prisons too (prisonlegalnews.org).

[–] PineRune@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

Not sure about death row, but many prisons have a commissary where you can buy junk food with personal funds either brought in with you from the outside or transferred from friends and family outside. Some people don't get fat -until- they go to prison.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ThePantser@lemmy.world 71 points 4 months ago (4 children)

If you survive one execution I don't think they should be allowed a do over, let him live in his cell, he earned it.

[–] Glowstick@lemmy.world 27 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I've heard (don't know if it's true) that in the old days if you survived a hanging then you were allowed to live

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 26 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I'd always heard the sentence 'hung by the neck until dead' was taken literally: If you survived the drop, you're just gonna be hanging there longer. The result is the same.

[–] KAYDUBELL@lemm.ee 18 points 4 months ago (3 children)

I’m gonna be pedantic for a second, hanged* not “hung”

[–] MagicShel@programming.dev 15 points 4 months ago

"... and they was right!"

[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 4 months ago (2 children)
[–] SonnyVabitch@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Luvs2Spuj@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

The law/sentence was actually changed after a Scottish woman survived being hanged resulting in this specific wording. There was a time when people did survive and were freed.

[–] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 4 months ago

I think that rule applied to the guillotine. If the blade stopped on the way down it was considered an act of god or some such.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 21 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I think there was a case somewhere that the prisoner was sentenced to death, and was executed ina fashion that didn't quite work.

But technically he did die for a minute or two before his heart restarted, and he sued to be released from prison because he technically served his sentence.

[–] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 8 points 4 months ago

Unfortunately it doesn't look like it. I misremembered a few details, he "died" from natural causes in prison, not execution. The court ruled "Schreiber is either alive, in which case he must remain in prison, or he is dead, in which case this appeal is moot."

His name was Benjamin Schreiber.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] andrewta@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

I agree. You get one try to execute, you fail? To bad.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 64 points 4 months ago

Abolish capital punishment. Freaking primitive apes.

[–] JimmyBigSausage@lemm.ee 62 points 4 months ago

Death penalty needs to go.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 40 points 4 months ago

Cruel and unusual. Unconstitutional.

[–] watson387@sopuli.xyz 32 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] Coreidan@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

I can’t think of a time in human history where we weren’t barbaric.

That’s not to say we shouldn’t change but I sure a fuck don’t see it happening anytime soon.

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 30 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Cruelty is the point for conservatives

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›