this post was submitted on 20 May 2024
168 points (96.2% liked)

Fuck Cars

9627 readers
417 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
ConfidentLonely@lemmy.world
Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world
toaster@slrpnk.net
168
Rhode Island DMV Is Trying To Ban Kei Trucks Again (www.thedrive.com)
submitted 5 months ago by lnxtx@feddit.nl to c/fuckcars@lemmy.world
19 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

But why the decision to ban Kei trucks from Rhode Island streets? Because the DMV claims they don't meet Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS).

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com 80 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

That snippit is out of context. The DMV claims they don't meet FMVSS because they don't.

... the DMV claims they don't meet Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS). And while it's true Kei vehicles don't meet those safety standards, they shouldn't have to. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), imported vehicles at least 25 years old are exempt from FMVSS.

They are exploiting a loophole for personal antique vehicles to import or resell a fleet that doesn't meet safety standards. It can become an issue and absolutely within scope of the DMV to keep an eye on.

[–] DrunkEngineer@lemmy.world 21 points 5 months ago

Then the DMV better start cracking down on large trucks (F250, etc) as well. NHTSA "safety" standards have had all kinds of loopholes exempting large trucks and SUV from basic safety features including rollover protection, head restraint, and various impact protection systems.

[–] Kuinox@lemmy.world 17 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Meanwhile motorcycle are still allowed.
Double standards.

[–] WldFyre@lemm.ee 15 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Motorcycles require additional certification before riding

[–] ianhclark510@lemmy.blahaj.zone 36 points 5 months ago

Damn, I’d study and take the test for a Kei truck citation in a heartbeat

[–] Kuinox@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The driver is unprotected on a Motorcycle, the kei truck ban is ... because it doesn't protect enough the driver in case of crash.
If you put the motorcycles on the same standard than the cars, none but a few would be allowed.

[–] 4am@lemm.ee 11 points 5 months ago

Helmets are not required in Rhode Island

[–] lnxtx@feddit.nl 80 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Weird safety standards.
They don't care about pedestrians (see Cybertruck)?

[–] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 43 points 5 months ago

See any truck

[–] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 33 points 5 months ago

The cyber truck is safe for pedestrians. Can't hit a pedestrian if it never leaves the repair bay for recalls.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The EU takes pedestrians (and cyclists) in account for safety standards, the US doesn't.

[–] witchergeraltofrivia@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

How do SUVs fit in that standard in EU?

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You basically need to design the car so pedestrians bounce over the hood instead of going under. So you can still to an SUV, but can't really do a Ford F150 style front.

[–] png@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 5 months ago

But the F150/Ranger and esp. RAM Trucks exist here

[–] Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The safety requirements this vehicle doesn't meet could easily be regarding hood design; highly studied and regulated to minimize pedestrian injury such as sharp angles or being pulled under the hood.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

I'm convinced the only thing lawsuits are waiting for is the accidents where they maim pedestrians. CT is a disaster for Tesla.

[–] fne8w2ah@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Ironic that kei trucks on this side of the pond are actually more productive than those killer pickup trucks prowling the roads.