this post was submitted on 31 May 2024
624 points (96.7% liked)

News

23367 readers
3132 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 398 points 5 months ago (7 children)

So the people who screamed about the scary, scary BLM protesters rioting due to what they (rightly) viewed as a miscarriage of justice now think rioting should happen because of what they (wrongly) view as a miscarriage of justice.

As usual, it's okay with they do it.

[–] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 152 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Everything. Is. A. Projection.

[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 70 points 5 months ago

Literally everything. They're afriad of Land Back because they fear the Native peoples will take the land the same way the founders of America took it. They're afraid of equality because they think when Black people do better it must mean they themselves will be worse off because they cant imagine wealth without exploitation, the way they used to make wealth for themselves.

[–] mynamesnotrick@lemmy.zip 39 points 5 months ago (6 children)

They took their stupid shot on Jan 6th and then they realized they were mostly larpers. Projection to the point of action.

[–] d00phy@lemmy.world 27 points 5 months ago

They took their first (arguably second after Charlottesville or the Bible photo op BS) shot on Jan 6. Don’t think there won’t be a second attempt. They view this guy as a messiah and they view themselves as religious. Him not getting what they want is a dangerous combination. He’s already shown the “greater good” has no place in his world.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sxan@midwest.social 62 points 5 months ago (9 children)

The thing I think is the most irreconcilable, incompromisable, consistently demonstrated behavior of The Right in America is the blatant hypocrisy about nearly all of their planks. It's the thing that, when the next civil war comes, will allow me to pull the trigger on anyone wearing a red baseball cap with little remorse.

  • Everyone needs guns to defend themselves from The State, because 2A! (Except for black people defending themselves from no-knock entry cops who got the address wrong)
  • The government shouldn't be allowed to tell us how to live! (Except for LGBTQ* people, women's choices about their own bodies, or homeless people)
  • The Constitution is sacrosanct! (Except for the part about separation of church and state, we just ignore that part)

It's the same for their every. Single. Position. It makes me weary, and furious, depressed and pessimistic.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 49 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Except for black people defending themselves from no-knock entry cops who got the address wrong

Don't forget Philando Castile, a legal gun owner who did exactly what the NRA said you should do when pulled over with a gun in the car and got shot. The NRA made barely a peep about it. Can't imagine white.

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 24 points 5 months ago (5 children)

Fuck the NRA. The majority of gun owners who aren't NRA tit suckin cop fuckers, still are pissed about that injustice, same with Breonna Taylor and Kenneth Walker. Anyone suggesting the police are there for them and want to disarm us all, these cases and a bunch more like them, are why we say fuck no.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] owenfromcanada@lemmy.world 61 points 5 months ago (2 children)

"But this time the guy was ~~white~~ ~~rich~~ ~~Republican~~ innocent!"

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 29 points 5 months ago (1 children)

And if they make that argument, I'll tell them that means they believe people are "guilty until proven innocent" and don't deserve a trial by a jury of their peers, which is as unAmerican an idea as you can get.

[–] peto@lemm.ee 51 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Not going to be useful. They don't want a democracy, they don't want a justice system. They want a king and the ability to use state power to shit on other people.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 39 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Trust me, I am in Indiana. I'm surrounded by these flag-waving morons. You call them unAmerican and they lose their shit. And all I have to do is pull up the Bill of Rights.

[–] psvrh@lemmy.ca 37 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Either PBS or NPR had a thing a few years back where they’d read sections of the Bill of Right on air, as part of Independence Day celebrations.

The right wing folks who heard it thought it was communist propaganda.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 31 points 5 months ago (3 children)

I get all this talk about their rights yet they seem so fundamentally opposed to me having mine.

These people are terrible citizens.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Rooskie91@discuss.online 22 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Yes. That's literally the platform. They say whatever they have to to cover their asses because all they really care about it being able to do whatever they want while forcing everyone else to do live by their rules.

They don't care when you point this out because that is their goal. They're shameless about it.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 148 points 5 months ago (5 children)

Funny how they're calling for riots instead of going to the streets and rioting.
I wonder if they remember what happened to them the last time they tried that shit 🤔.

[–] elliot_crane@lemmy.world 118 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Pepperidge farm remembers. The crowd that was all about “back(ing) the blue” managed to kill a police officer and four of themselves.

[–] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 50 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Then Fox News refused to air spots the dc police wanted to put up. Fun fact

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] No_Change_Just_Money@feddit.de 58 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Give them a break

Are you really expecting all the people posting this stuff to pay for the flight from Russia?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 27 points 5 months ago

There are a lot of armchair generals on the Internet. Unfortunately not limited to the Republican side of things.

But the Republican ones tend to be bigger hypocrites since they usually condemn rioting when anyone else does it, especially if they aren't white.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 123 points 5 months ago (8 children)

These morons want a king. Can't even reflect for 5 seconds and think the guilty verdict is because he committed a crime.

[–] Endorkend@kbin.social 45 points 5 months ago (6 children)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 83 points 5 months ago (30 children)

I looked at /r/conservative last night and it was not good for my mental health. Thousands of commenters all agree it was a sham trial that he will win on appeal and that this will only earn him votes.

The last two things, they may be right about and that's terrifying.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 82 points 5 months ago (1 children)

They don't even realize that that's not how appeals work. It's not just "the appellate court says acquittal," there needs to A) have been a failure in the legal process which B) would have been impactful on the jury's verdict during the first trial for an appeal to be successful. Appellate courts only address the legal process. An appellate court would only get into addressing the facts of the case if there was an absolutely glaring smoking gun to point to some evidence or testimony having been false.

You know, like Allen Weisselberg does when he testifies.

Even if an appellate court was to side with Trump's appeal, that just means it goes back to the lower court to be tried again, unless the DA goes "yeah, forget it."

[–] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 45 points 5 months ago

This right here. I am not a legal expert, but I do know that this is how it typically works. The point I want to make, though, is that the prosecution likely knew trump would want to appeal, thus tried to make their legal process as air tight and by the book as possible

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 38 points 5 months ago

My favorite is the ones crying about how America has fallen into nazism because... Trump got convicted of a crime with overwhelming evidence of it.

And its especially funny considering how down with nazism they have been until its conversationally convenient to suddenly cry about the evil nazi persecution.

load more comments (28 replies)
[–] Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee 81 points 5 months ago

So terrorists.

[–] VeryImportantUser@lemmy.world 75 points 5 months ago (17 children)

At what point do we consider Trump voters as terrorists? Waiting until they actually kill people or destroy everything doesn't sound like a good idea.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 39 points 5 months ago (5 children)

Voters? Never.

Supporters who organize to commit acts of terror like shutting down local libraries via threats of violence? Now. We should be doing that now.

I didn't fight shit heads in Iraq just to have more shit heads do it here.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 35 points 5 months ago (6 children)

Didn't they march inside some important government building and try to overthrow an election at some point?

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 27 points 5 months ago (4 children)

I guarantee the crime rate of maga is greater than the undocumented immigrant population. We already know undocumented immigrants commit less crime than native-born Americans as a whole.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 69 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect. - Francis M. Wilhoit

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 69 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Great, let the rioters expose themselves, then lock them up.

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 22 points 5 months ago

You don't expect the cops to lock themselves up,do you?

[–] xantoxis@lemmy.world 64 points 5 months ago (4 children)

, and then nothing happened because they're all a bunch of piss babies.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] BeautifulMind@lemmy.world 45 points 5 months ago (2 children)

...thus showing that the "Law and Order" party was never about law, they just want a particular kind of order- that is, a hierarchy wherein people below them on the status-ladder know not to try to hold them accountable to anything, including the law or even plain decency.

To them, the law is the cudgel to keep the poors and plebes in their place- low in the order- never to be applied to them.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world 40 points 5 months ago (3 children)

They want their perceived enemies to make the first move. They might be calling for violence, but many of them are cowards and also love to play victim and win the sympathy Olympics.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] MagicShel@programming.dev 35 points 5 months ago (5 children)

Can I show up to their riots carrying a George Floyd sign and just feign ignorance about what's being protested? Over/under on getting shot? (I'm white so factor that into the odds.)

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 35 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I hope they do it, and get arrested and convicted so they can't vote.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] bignate31@lemmy.world 34 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Favourite part of the whole article:

A spokesperson for Truth Social said, “It’s hard to believe that Reuters, once a respected news service, has fallen so low as to publish such a manipulative, false, defamatory and transparently stupid article as this one purely out of political spite.”

"You never saw what you thought you saw. And even if you did, it was entirely justified and your interpretation was extreme."

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 32 points 5 months ago

Fuck around & find out, chuds.

[–] Spitzspot@lemmings.world 31 points 5 months ago

Caught them right in the feelings. Toddler tantrums will be dealt with as such.

[–] MxM111@kbin.social 23 points 5 months ago

I kind of understand them, because if you listen Fox News, you will learn about Soviet style prosecution, about how judge manipulated court. “Expert” after “expert” say that it is political hunting, etc. It is easy to manipulate those with single source of news and views.

[–] ulkesh@lemmy.world 23 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The usual response from the whiny degenerates.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›