Doesn't the broken-by-Congress railroad strike demonstrate that Biden, et al. have already chosen their side, and that it isn't labor?
this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2023
264 points (97.8% liked)
Work Reform
10011 readers
325 users here now
A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.
Our Philosophies:
- All workers must be paid a living wage for their labor.
- Income inequality is the main cause of lower living standards.
- Workers must join together and fight back for what is rightfully theirs.
- We must not be divided and conquered. Workers gain the most when they focus on unifying issues.
Our Goals
- Higher wages for underpaid workers.
- Better worker representation, including but not limited to unions.
- Better and fewer working hours.
- Stimulating a massive wave of worker organizing in the United States and beyond.
- Organizing and supporting political causes and campaigns that put workers first.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
For who didn't, it's worth it to read the whole article. It's this stuff that doesn't make the news.
Thank you for posting this. I'm so tired of the rhetoric surrounding the rail strike.
They didn't allow them to strike. It doesn't matter that they still helped the union negotiate. They kneecapped their bargaining power.
Libs are just as deaf to criticism of their party as conservatives are.
A successful rail strike would have emboldened the working class, whatever the administration did after doesn't negate the damage they did to the current labor movement by stopping it.
This union didn't vote to strike. They were fine with the original agreement without sick days and didn't have anything taken away in the congressional strike breaking.
Its always IBEW
Source: union trying to spin a measly 4 sick days in an entire year as a complete victory while giving Biden oversized credit for merely APPOINTING the people who did all the work.
While he DOES deserve a little credit for appointing good pro-union people to the relevant posts, this wasn't his doing.
The only thing HE did personally was use his influence as president to effectively strip them of their hard won right to strike by forcing them to (provisionally, but still) accept a bad agreement from his owner donors in the corrupt rail industry.
Not a union that had and still has strike-worthy grievances, or a major union within the railroad industry. Has made a great pro-Biden press piece though.
Yep. I was hoping someone would comment this. He didn't want to take an economic hit right before the midterms, so broke the strike but also essentially made the reailroad give concessions.
Less than 50% of what they were seeking though, it’s a concession, not a victory. They got 4 whole days, wow, such good.
When people strike, they do not unyieldingly demand 100% of what they asked for initially. It is a negotiation. They negotiate. While 50% is not ideal, it is progress and pretty decent concessions.
Less than 50%, 28% to be precise. That’s just the sick days, if we include all the other things they were asking for, they got less than 10% of what they asked for.
Media cycles have broken people's memory.
Oh this is very different from a UAV strike.
It's the Unmanned Aerial Wehicle, it's not that different.
Yeah! Strike! Time to show these tuckers who has the power.
Are the people in charge of unions this naive, or is this is just a pandering political statement
Democrats are just a capitalistic spinoff to appeal to the left, and prevent any true left movement to gain steam
Guaranteed that Biden would convince the rest of the Dems to override their rights, just like with the rail workers.
It's frankly ridiculous that anyone still thinks he's pro-labor. He's on the side of management every time.