this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2023
402 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

58143 readers
5203 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Roku looks to be seriously tightening its pursestrings. The company’s laying off a full ten percent of its workforce, over 300 employees, in addition to a conducting a number of other cost-cutting measures, as reported by Variety. These job cuts are just the beginning, as Roku’s also removing streaming content, consolidating office space and reducing outside service expenses. The goal here is a major reduction in the year-over-year operating expense growth rate.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] zerkrazus@lemmy.world 164 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I know an even better way for them to save money. Anthony Wood, the CEO, gets like $20,990,000 in total yearly compensation. Like most these fucks most of it is non-salary, so they don't pay taxes on it right away if at all.

[–] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you slice his compensation in half, that's about 100 employees he can pay at $100k for a full year.

[–] BottleOfAlkahest@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So employees cost more than just their salaries (if they get things like benefits, 401K match, etc.) So you'd have to cut more than half of his total compensation, which I don't think either of us would be mad about

[–] HeyJoe@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

I also doubt most of those employees made 100k either so it's probably still a good estimate.

[–] downpunxx@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

[$10,000 monthly budget on candles.] Help my family is dying, someone help me please. ~ dril

Wow. That is insane. You better be god's gift to business brilliance to justify that.

[–] Mugmoor@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Torrents of The Weird Al movie are about to become quite popular.

[–] Jestzer@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Which is funny because he originally encouraged people in countries without Roku to do so.

[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I bought a Roku TV when I moved. Used it a few weeks and then realized the level of horrific tracking my pi-hole server was blocking from it. (thanks PiHole) I reset it to factory and no longer allowed it on the network. Now it's an acceptable TV with a completely dogshit useless remote.

Sort of related- is it even possible to buy a "dumb" TV anymore or are we stuck paying 8x as much for "digital signage" panels now?

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Spectre makes a dumb 4K TV. It's a good panel that doesn't track usage.

[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I shouldn't be this excited about the link, but double-checked the specs on their official site and it's not even equipped with ethernet/wifi- the world is so shitty these days that I almost squealed like a little girl. Thanks for sharing that.

[–] dudewitbow@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why would it need ethernet/wifi if its a dumb tv?

[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

It wouldn't. That's the feature I wanted to NOT see on it :D

[–] teruma@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

It's a just ok panel. Tends to look really washed out.

[–] neardeaf@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Dude SAME HERE. When I first setup my pihole I’m like “JESUS CHRIST WHY ARE MY 2 ROKUS MAKE UP over 80% OF REQUESTS!?”

That day I gave them away and moved to Apple TVs. Shit has been so so much better ever since

[–] wjrii@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The digital signage/business displays are still at a premium, but the upcharge is doesn't have to hit 8x, though you'll have to supply a source of course, plus also a bracket or stand for the VESA mount. Maybe $200 premium to deshittify?

[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I admit I was being a bit sarcastic with the price. :)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago (3 children)

removes streaming content

What else do they do/have?

[–] Infynis@midwest.social 25 points 1 year ago (3 children)

You'll still be able to stream stuff from normal apps. It's just the apps owned by Roku that will be affected, which, I don't know about you, but I've never used despite having three Rokus

[–] HubertManne@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

I actually have. I don't think roku had any content that was not available on other free stream services. It came down to how do you like you ad blocks.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] greybeard@lemmy.one 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A popular and powerful device for streaming other services. And direct integration in certain TVs as the "Smart" OS. Streaming was something they tried to build their offering and widen their reach when Google and Apple started getting decent streaming boxes themselves and TV manufacturers started having usable(while still bad) smart OSs.

[–] fishpen0@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This market is getting saturated fast. Apple TV, Fire TV both pair directly to at least one first class streaming service as they are developed by the same company. Chromecast is still hanging on. Plex offers streaming content now as part of Plex pass. Cable tv boxes can now also do native streaming to select services. Major TV brands are dropping the Roku OS to roll their own shitty android port.

I personally moved to the Apple TV because it’s the only one probably not selling my data and isn’t constantly griping at me with some kind of upsell like the Roku and Fire Tv

[–] Montagge@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

I setup a mini pc with Linux Mint to act as a streaming device that has worked great!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GeekFTW@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

The hardware side, I assume.

[–] greenskye@lemm.ee 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My only real issue with Roku is the lack of a decent Ethernet port on them. 100mbit ports are too slow for 2023

[–] SharkyPants@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

It does feel like antiquated tech but what streaming service uses even 50+mbps streaming? The services I know of (apple, Netflix, Disney) all max out around 30mbps.

[–] bobman@unilem.org 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Paid streaming and smart tvs were always a scam to try to get computer-functionality in a TV, but lock it down so you can only serve people garbage.

If you want to stream something, just stream it for free here: https://fmovies.to/

All you need is ublock origin. No credit card required. No signups.

But yeah, everyone jumps to say "x isn't on y, or z isn't on t" rather than just share how to watch it all for free.

[–] bingbong@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have a Roku TV.

I liked it at first because it's just a vehicle for using Netflix, Hulu, or streaming from a HDMI.

But in the past 6 months, more and more ads keep showing. Things I'm refusing to interact with. Tried blocking and then they circumvented that.

[–] missveeronica@lemmynsfw.com 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Not only that, but now all apps have to have remove any Screensaver that kept the screen active on that app. For instance, Plex now doesn't have a Screensaver so if you are listening to music and pause it too long, you lose all progress on that Playlist and it starts all over again. Big bummer that is making me question getting a new Roku later this year.

[–] Nusm@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago

Looks like it’s time for me to sell my Roku stock that I bought during the pandemic when their price was constantly going up.

To be fair, it’s pretty telling that I have a TV with built in Roku, but I only use it to access my Apple TV which is faster and smoother.

[–] hellfire103@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

DVDs, people. DVDs and Blu-Rays.

[–] mwguy@infosec.pub 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Blu-Rays generally are a bad idea. They're so concerned with piracy that they make things like ripping your Blu-Rays needlessly difficult, especially for recently released to video Blu-Rays.

Honestly it's easier to just pirate.

[–] tony@lemmy.hoyle.me.uk 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Meh.. it's not that hard. Get something that's libredrive compatible and run makemkv on it. Not had a failure yet.

The real downside is that blurays (esp. HD ones) are too expensive to get a decent collection.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ansiz@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

I take this as a good sign that the data tracking market is growing stale. Like what value can tracking my viewing habits provide anyone, other than Roku, that the streaming platforms aren't already doing on their own? It's straight double dipping.

[–] wjrii@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I read this in some other article, but it seems like the margins are slim for their hardware because while (IMHO) the interface is still best in a very poor class, almost everybody else does it more or less adequately, so they can't charge much of a premium. They've been making more money on their ad-supported streaming, both on-demand and their collection of all the free linear streams that you use to convince your rerun-loving gramma not make you climb into the attic to install an OTA antenna. The SAG and WGA strikes have done a number on how much advertisers are buying and at what prices. While I always wonder if there aren't other places to cut first (coughexecutivecompensationcough) I don't doubt that they're in a way worse place than they were a year ago.

[–] PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The best streaming device is an old Linux PC with one of those Logitech touchpad keyboards.

The amount of ads on streaming sticks infuriates me.

[–] wjrii@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

Good suggestion, particularly for folks around here, but it's not exactly the same product category as a consumer offering. :-)

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] peanutdust@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They where only popular bc the other options where also crappy or very expensive. Also I highly doubt anyone bought a roku tv bc it was roku, it's more like they didnt have a choice.

[–] BURN@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I definitely did. It’s the best of the interfaces I’ve worked with. Samsung and LG both have abysmal built in OS’s and I do want an internet connected TV.

They’re privacy nightmares, but they work a whole lot better than the competition.

[–] EnderMB@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Fully agreed. It's the best of a bad situation, and their apps do run reasonably well compared to the absolute shitshow that is Samsung.

[–] dan1101@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

I love the Roku remote and interface. But I have a Google TV and even though I'm sure it's sending my viewing habits to Google it's also basically and Android device so you can do many more things with it than a Roku. You can't install anything on a Roku that Roku doesn't specifically authorize.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 5 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The company’s laying off a full ten percent of its workforce, over 300 employees, in addition to a conducting a number of other cost-cutting measures, as reported by Variety.

These job cuts are just the beginning, as Roku’s also removing streaming content, consolidating office space and reducing outside service expenses.

The goal here is a major reduction in the year-over-year operating expense growth rate.

The company hasn’t announced which content it would be removing from its various streaming platforms and whether or not these cuts would be culled from third-party providers or from in-house projects like the recently-released Weird Al biopic.

Roku’s so serious about these cuts that it’s willing to pony up $65 million for impairment charges after deleting this content, according to an SEC filing.

However, even Roku admits these figures are uncertain, noting in a Q2 letter to shareholders that the “macro environment continued to create uncertainty,” given the ongoing WGA and SAG-AFTRA strikes.


The original article contains 347 words, the summary contains 157 words. Saved 55%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Oh yeah, they DO have streaming content I guess. I never go in to that section of the TV.

load more comments
view more: next ›