this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2024
115 points (99.1% liked)

News

23301 readers
3422 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] riskable@programming.dev 32 points 4 months ago

Correction: 3/5ths of certain embryos.

[–] Rottcodd@lemmy.world 26 points 4 months ago

While denying them to everyone else. Other than white male christofascists.

[–] Omgboom@lemmy.zip 25 points 4 months ago (1 children)

They want to give embryos guns

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Good moms with guns prevent womb shootings.

[–] MagicShel@programming.dev 16 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Isn't that a constitutional problem? A fetus in a foreign woman visiting the USA is a potential American citizen depending on the location of birth. So would it have constitutional protections based on that? Would it necessarily extend certain protections to that woman?

[–] ramble81@lemm.ee 10 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Yeah about that. They also want to get rid of birthright citizenship.

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

They also want to shoot them.

Baby steps, just like the OG Nazis they admire.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 months ago

Ain't gonna be baby steps for long if Trump wins again.

[–] MagicShel@programming.dev 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I don't think they can without changing the constitution, which if they ever get that chance it's game over anyway.

[–] ramble81@lemm.ee 4 points 4 months ago

Have you met the current Supreme Court?

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 13 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Look at this embryo being denied of its right to bear arms because its mom is in prison smh

It's the fault of those damn woke /s

[–] dactylotheca@suppo.fi 12 points 4 months ago

Well this seems like a decision that couldn't possibly have any unforeseen effects

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

The only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a fetus with a gun.

[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

If they do you should claim them on your rax return. Some states wrote laws that you can't but if its a life it has INALIENABLE rights and I'd claim every embryo in a fertility clinic and make the IRS prove in court they aren't people.

[–] Delusional@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Yeah a whole bunch of laws would need to be changed because a fetus is not a human and laws know that. Idiots don't. Imagine if your birthday was the day your parents conceived you.

[–] beetlejuice0001@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 months ago

Pregnancy tests at the entrance of every ticketed event. That’s two people going in. Need to be charged accordingly.

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

Aka steal your parental rights

[–] paysrenttobirds@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Doesn't this bely the "toned down language on abortion" that leaves it to the states? Because once it's a constitutional issue, the supreme Court can overturn any state's protection of abortion rights. Just the idea that a ball of unconscious cells has the same or more right to life as the 24yr old women it lives in is disgusting to me. His platform is just more vague, it still contains all of the possibilities of the original.

Can we at least deny rights to the sperms and eggs? How about ensuring the right to contraception

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

It was never about leaving it up to the states.

[–] MagicShel@programming.dev 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

They don't care about lying or hypocrisy, so unfortunately your first point is moot to them. They have no honor to go back on.

[–] paysrenttobirds@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago

They are making this new list to keep voters who were unhappy with project 2025 so I think it's important to point out it doesn't actually exclude any of those provisions. It's not a promise to be more moderate and actually winking at the far right the whole time.