this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2024
23 points (87.1% liked)

Movies

7479 readers
177 users here now

Lemmy

Welcome to Movies, a community for discussing movies, film news, box office, and more! We want this to be a place for members to feel safe to discuss and share everything they love about movies and movie related things. Please feel free to take part and help our community grow!


Related Communities:

!books@lemmy.world - Discussing books and book-related things.

!comicbooks@lemmy.world - A place to discuss comic books of all types.

!marvelstudios@lemmy.world - LW's home for all things MCU.


While posting and commenting in this community, you must abide by the Lemmy.World Terms of Service: https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

  1. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, or advocating violence will be removed.

  2. Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally insult others.

  3. Spam, self promotion, trolling, and bots are not allowed

  4. Shitposts and memes are allowed until they prove to be a problem.

    Regarding spoilers; Please put "(Spoilers)" in the title of your post if you anticipate spoilers, as we do not currently have a spoiler tag available. If your post contains an image that could be considered a spoiler, please mark the thread as NSFW so the image gets blurred. As far as how long to wait until the post is no longer a spoiler, please just use your best judgement. Everyone has a different idea on this, so we don't want to make any hard limits.

    Please use spoiler tags whenever commenting a spoiler in a non-spoiler thread. Most of the Lemmy clients don't support this but we want to get into the habit as clients will be supporting in the future.

Failure to follow these guidelines will result in your post/comment being removed and/or more severe actions. All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. We ask that the users report any comment or post that violates the rules, and to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

I'm not a fan of this rotoscope looking CGI animation that seems to be so popular. All of the characters always seem too crisp and "on model". There's no room for artistically blending characters into shadow.

I suppose a faithful Watchmen cartoon is fine as a way to show it to people who wouldn't read the comic, but given the choice between the two this looks like it falls short.

[–] aasatru@kbin.earth 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I agree. The best thing I can say about this is that it's just like watching the comic book.

Which is fun, except that the comic book already exists and it's great. If people want to watch a movie instead the Zack Snyder flick is fine and at least keeps it somewhat original.

It's fun enough to see, but more than anything it just feels unnecessary.

[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I don't mean to spew too much (but I will), but this animation really loses something compared to the comic.

Look at this page of Rorschach ziplining up the building.

The 9 panel layout gives this great visual story telling. Look at things like the buildings in the top left panel, how there is no outline just windows to give the impression of an outline. In the middle left panel, the details of Rorschach's mask and chest have been deliberately minimized with specifically chosen heavy shadows- unlike taking a 3D model and casting a computer calculated shadow on it. The building in the middle panel is drawn to ensure it really feels looming.

Etc, etc. There is so much thought put into the layout, angles, colors, and forms in the drawn comic that make it so top tier.

It's possible to make a cartoon movie that captures that, but you'd really have to get some quality artists and directors (and give them actual artistic freedom) to not just be technically proficient but make solid artistic choices.

[–] aasatru@kbin.earth 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Excellent reminder of how amazing the comic book looks. And how incredibly dull this trailer looks by comparison.

I'm not so sure the same visual style can be captured well in a cartoon movie - the flat colours and high contrast visuals would probably look funky in motion. Happy to be proven wrong though!

Edit: I guess in a way it has already been done with the motion comic. Looks better than the new movie for sure, but lacks the impact of the comic strip in my opinion.

[–] janonymous@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Yeah, I really hate these. It looks like the cutscene of some fighting game, stilted and soulless. I'm sure they put a lot of heart and effort into it, but I don't feel it unfortunately.

[–] kescusay@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Huh. Not really impressed with the voice acting or the heavy focus on Rorschach for the trailer. He was a main character, not the main character.

Disappointing.

[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The trailer is, to its credit, doing some decent misdirection so the whole plot isn't given away. Rorschach as a noir detective is a decent hook for people who don't know about Watchmen and you can show a lot of snippets of that without spoiling much.

[–] aasatru@kbin.earth 8 points 4 months ago

If I remember correctly he's also kind of the narrator in the book - we follow other characters as well, but Rorschach is the one taking the active role of narrating the universe through his diary entries or whatever. Makes his voice an obvious hook for a trailer.

[–] Habahnow@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

WTF. It's literally the movie again. This seems extremely uninteresting. huge pass from me. I'll stick to the movie and the watchmen mini series.

[–] leftzero@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It seems to be based on the book, not the film.

[–] Habahnow@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Which is what the movie is based off of, and did a pretty decent job. There's such a lot that can be done in their universe, yet the corpos decide to just squeeze out as much money through remakes.

[–] leftzero@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 4 months ago

DC's gonna DC. 🤷‍♂️

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Uhh, the comedian* wasn't a superhero. He was a vigilante. They were all vigilantes, except Dr manhattan

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago
[–] UKFilmNerd@feddit.uk 3 points 4 months ago

Even though it looks like the comic ➡️ live action ➡️ animation, I'll still give it a shot. At least they've spent more time on this than there usual straight to video stuff, which to me, looks cheap.