if he had biometrics turned on they might have just pointed it at his face
this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2024
52 points (98.1% liked)
Cybersecurity
5644 readers
113 users here now
c/cybersecurity is a community centered on the cybersecurity and information security profession. You can come here to discuss news, post something interesting, or just chat with others.
THE RULES
Instance Rules
- Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
- No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
- No Ads / Spamming.
- No pornography.
Community Rules
- Idk, keep it semi-professional?
- Nothing illegal. We're all ethical here.
- Rules will be added/redefined as necessary.
If you ask someone to hack your "friends" socials you're just going to get banned so don't do that.
Learn about hacking
Other security-related communities !databreaches@lemmy.zip !netsec@lemmy.world !cybersecurity@lemmy.capebreton.social !securitynews@infosec.pub !netsec@links.hackliberty.org !cybersecurity@infosec.pub !pulse_of_truth@infosec.pub
Notable mention to !cybersecuritymemes@lemmy.world
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
it's totally this or fingerprint. don't forget the omni fingerprint set that supposedly can unlock any phone in one hand's worth of composite fingerprints.
I feel like that's the first thing they would try, article says they took a few days
I doubt there was a lot of his face left.
Actually, his face was pretty much in tact. There's close up pictures of the shooter dead online, I believe they shot him in the neck. Don't get me wrong, taking close up photos of him dead is pretty fucked up, considering how the parents must've felt about all of this.
Bro you can’t say that then not drop the links.
I worked for a private company in computer forensics. We had two machines, expensive machines, dedicated to accessing phones. I'm going to go out on a limb here and guess the FBI has something similar, if not better, at their disposal.
Were the machines always successful? If not, how often did they fail and why? Was there a difference between Android or iPhones?
Short of the device being damaged, they were successful 100% of the time. No difference between manufacturers and platforms.
Basically all phone, iphone and Android
This is an arms race, at the moment the crackers are in the lead.
There is probably some kind of backdoor into devices utilizing a recovery or diagnostic mode. Either that or AES has been broken for many years now
It's probably some set of zero days they're sitting on.
Passcode 0000
1234
How did you guess my password!!
Biometrics, also people are horrible at making good passwords/pin codes. There's also normally a few tricks to get around being locked out for X minutes/days/years. Also you can bet Apple or whoever made his phone bent over backwards to help the FBI get in to that phone. The idiot tried to shoot a former president of the United States.
I don’t disagree with the article, but it strikes me as speculation. I would sooner say that we don’t know, though the assumptions are fairly reasonable.
I mean it's not like we'll ever know, so I think there's a little fun to be had in speculating
Certainly, but I’m just too eager to know the technical details if there were some.