this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2024
168 points (99.4% liked)

News

23287 readers
4686 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Private and public investment in clean energy rose to a total of $147B in the first half of this year — a record-setting figure.

Exactly two years ago today, President Joe Biden signed the Inflation Reduction Act, establishing a wide array of clean energy programs meant to supercharge spending on climate solutions.

Investment in clean energy projects — from solar manufacturing facilities to home batteries to hydrogen hubs — has taken off ever since, rising to record heights in the first half of this year.

Across the first six months of 2024, U.S. cleantech investment hit $147 billion, per new data from the Clean Investment Monitor, a joint project from Rhodium Group and the MIT Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research. That’s a more than 30 percent jump from the first half of 2023. The report measures actual investment — not announcements or plans — from both public and private sources.

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 22 points 2 months ago (1 children)

A moment of good news is nice, every once in a while.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

I was going to check the inflation rates to see if they were actually higher, then just settled with accepting it as good news and not to check.

[–] beepnoise@piefed.social 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's genuinely impressive the US has spent more in Q1+Q2 than it has in 2021 and previously. A very good turnaround!

I think the US is taking this green energy seriously as they really want to be at the forefront of whatever new technological revolutions that shake out from green energy investments (as opposed to, say, China).

Whatever the reason, this sort of race is ultimately a good thing for humanity as a whole.

[–] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

as opposed to, say, China

Could you expand on that?

[–] takeda@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

China also aggressively pursues green energy and wants to be the leader in that field.

[–] Nfamwap@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

A 21st century green space-race is exactly what we need. Nothing furthers technology better than good old competition. And war. But competition will do.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 7 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Is there a corresponding shift to green energy production? Because spending is good, but I want to see actual reduction in fossil fuel use and an increase in green energy use.

[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The true measure of success is the percentage of our total energy consumption that comes from renewables/fossil fuels.

In 2013, renewables accounted for 5.8% of total energy consumption, fossil fuels accounted for 84.4% of total energy consumption.

In 2023, renewables accounted for 9.8% of total energy consumption, fossil fuels accounted for 80.6% of total energy consumption.

Source

It's certainly moving in the right direction, but much more needs to be done.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

That was signed 2 years ago. I imagine that this wouldn’t appear in the renewable production metrics for a few years. Energy infrastructure projects don’t go from investment to output quickly. You have planning, hiring, permitting, building, etc. There is also a lag time from when a bill is signed to when an administration can staff offices to accept and review grants, cut checks, etc.

The federal government usually issues a report about annual energy production at the end of the calendar year. The report usually gets posted in Feb or Mar after the information has been collected and synthesized.

We might see a bump in the 2024 report, assuming Trump doesn’t win and we actually get a 2024 report. That said, I wouldn’t expect to see this money impacting the grid for a few more years out.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 4 points 2 months ago

CO2 emissions in the US peaked in 2007 and have been on a steady decline since, for what it's worth