this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2024
106 points (100.0% liked)

PC Gaming

8568 readers
693 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 34 points 2 months ago (4 children)
[–] andyburke@fedia.io 24 points 2 months ago

This is probably true and will be the death-nell of Intel.

GPU/FPU has been driving the success of the companies eating Intel's lunch. If Intel stops on this front, they're Texas Instruments all over again.

I'm hoping Intel keeps their GPU division as they basically get free driver development support from the community but yeah, there's a good chance this is getting axed

[–] taanegl@beehaw.org 9 points 2 months ago

I'm guessing it's the Wifi business that's going to be sold. Also, the prefabs might be spun off. But Intel still needs a GPU division, if at the very least just for integrated GPUs, but we might see the end of dedicated Intel GPU's as they pivot to compete against AMD's APU's.

That's my take, at least.

[–] CMDR_Horn@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Came here to say the same thing lol

[–] PenisDuckCuck9001@lemmynsfw.com 15 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Cool, if they're cutting stuff out and selling factories, their days are numbered. Good riddance. That's what you get for selling everyone the same fucking cpu from about 2010-2020, only bothering to change the pin counts just to sell more motherboards.

[–] Blackout@fedia.io 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There goes their division of fine aged meats

[–] Leeks@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Here’s the problem, I am not quite sure if they do or do not have a division of fine aged meats. Like if this was P&G, yeah they most definitely have a Div Fine Aged Meats, but Intel, I would have to look that up. And the fact that I would have to look that up to be certain that Intel doesn’t have a DFAM, well that’s just scary.

[–] recentSloth43@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

So no more executives and middle managers? Sounds like a good plan

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

Best we can do is no raises and chopping operation expenses by half.

[–] hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

They fucked around and found out. Whatever their cost cutting is will now make or break the company. If it's GPUs, they will commit to clawing at their CPU share. If it's CPUs (which sounds like the wildest plan), Nvidia might finally have to stop fucking around.

We'll see, but it's a very important decision and it will take them years to catch up to whatever they are committing to

[–] neshura@bookwormstory.social 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

As much as I currently prefer AMD processors over Intel I would hate to see them go. Without serious competition AMD will just do the exact same thing Intel did before Ryzen dropped. The problem I see now is that if Intel gets into a situation as horrible as AMD was in there are not as many revolutionary concepts out there anymore that would get them out of that hole.

[–] cornshark@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Do you think arm cpu manufacturers like Apple, Samsung, qualcomm are now in a position to act as competition for amd?

[–] neshura@bookwormstory.social 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Difficult to say, Arm is a bit weird when you compare it to x64 CPU's because it does not have comlex instructions (by design) which means that for low intensity and 'simple' workloads an Arm CPU will be vastly more power efficient. However the more complicated the workload gets the more x64 has an advantage due to specialized instructions.

So for most users yes Arm will start being very competetive since the #1 metric there is battery life. However for datacenter, workstation and gaming usage Arm just cannot compete and very likely never will.

[–] QuadratureSurfer@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

This article doesn't go into it, but Louis Rossmann pointed out that their profit margin has tanked recently.

https://odysee.com/how-intel's-oxidation-scandal-screws

At the end of 2021 it was 25.1% for the year.
At the end of 2022 it was 12.7%
At the end of 2023 it was 3.1%

Even ignoring the downward trend, at a margin like 3%, a small swing in the market, a small mistake in inventory ordering, or replacing a bunch of CPUs that had an oxidation issue during the manufacturing process will push them over the edge into losing money instead of making money.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OVdmK1UGzGs

Not saying this to defend Intel, just pointing out a major reason as to why they are scrambling to cut down on costs.

edit: formatting

[–] a9249@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago

I know you're reading this. Fix your management... by removing half of them and the management bloat they introduced to justify their existence... or perish.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 months ago

The Dithering podcast was talking about Intel in today's ep. They agreed that this shit needed to change both ten years ago and (further back) when modern smartphones became a thing. I worry that Intel can't right this ship.

[–] blarth@thelemmy.club 1 points 2 months ago

Just looking around their site, it’s trash like this that needs to get the axe.

https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/wireless-network/5g-network/overview.html