this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2024
2 points (100.0% liked)

BestOfLemmy

7194 readers
2 users here now

Manual curation of great Lemmy discussions and threads

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

... I think learning about Nicholas II really contextualized fascism for me. The tsar was a traditionalist authoritarian rather than a fascist, but he really shows, I think, how ordinary people can hold totalitarian beliefs and still be ‘good people’ (note that I would never call the tsar a good person, but bear with me). Oftentimes people say “X is fascism” but quickly backpedal if real-world comparisons are drawn between family or friends. “They’re a good person!” they object, “Just misguided! Not like the other rubes!”

But Nicholas II shows the face of genuinely conservative authoritarianism. The face of the mediocre man, who puts no deeper thought into his beliefs than to parrot what he was raised with and stubbornly resist all challenge to that. He was not exceptionally cruel in terms of personality. I think probably a significant minority of ‘nice’ people, in Nicholas II’s circumstances, would have turned out just as big a piece of shit as he was. ...

see here for the full comment by @PugJesus: https://lemmy.world/comment/11418466

top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BackOnMyBS@lemmy.autism.place 1 points 3 months ago

I'm not seeing what OP quoted as part of the original comment. Anyone else?

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

It is an interesting bit. It gets right up to, but stops just short of identifying how the tyrranies and atrocities attributed to these people are systems built by humanity.

Those parts aren't inherently about the individual, but rather the station and system within society that they operate.