Rolando

joined 1 year ago
[–] Rolando@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago (2 children)

They should make it a tourism thing. I unironically want to go Garf-phone picking at Le Mer du Chat in France.

[–] Rolando@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You're right, my comment was pretty condescending, I apologize. Your points are well-taken, thanks for giving me something to think about.

[–] Rolando@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Well I'm glad you found a movie you like. But I gotta say, "the movie is bad because it was made bad on purpose" just seems like copium.

Since you're interested in history: Tolstoy's novel "War and Peace" also makes an anti-Great Man point about Napoleon, both in Tolstoy's depiction of the Battle of Borodino, as well as in historical thoughts that are usually collected at the end of that novel. I don't remember if Bondarchuk's movie adaption of War and Peace retains that theme, but you can see it on youtube. The best Napoleon movie is arguably Waterloo which is somewhat critical of Napoleon. Likewise, the Napoleon miniseries has him act like kind of a doofus at times (and has an interesting depiction of the Napoleon-Josephine relationship).

I guess I'm just kind of bitter about this film because most of us in the US don't have a lot of knowledge about European history since our teachers are underpaid, our academics are ridiculed, and because our historical movies and TV shows are generally ahistorical cartoonish BS like this one.

[–] Rolando@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (5 children)

From reading the reviews and social media comments, it annoyed anyone with an interest in history.

If I were paid to promote this film, I'd say something like: you can tell from the previews and the theatrical release that there's good cinematography, set design, costumes, etc. Well in the extended version there's MORE of it. And then tacitly suggest that people play it in the background with the sound off while listening to classical music.

[–] Rolando@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (7 children)

Scott spent over $100 million to piss off the French, which any Englishmen would love to do if given half a chance.

Got it. This movie is only really interesting if you're from England.

[–] Rolando@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

Yeah Jordan Peele is a genius.

[–] Rolando@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago

Demi Moore is pretty cool. Thoughts go out to Bruce Willis.

On !fullmoviesonyoutube@lemm.ee:

[–] Rolando@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

Looks amazing. I was a bit worried about Zack Snyder being involved, but apparently:

Series Directed by

David Hartman ... (1 episode, 2024)

Jay Oliva ... (unknown episodes)

Series Writing Credits

Eric Carrasco ... (head writer) (1 episode, 2024)

Jay Oliva ... (unknown episodes)

Zack Snyder ... (unknown episodes)

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt10625492/fullcredits/

[–] Rolando@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

As I recall, the French navy was seriously weakened by their revolution of the late 1700s because many of the officers were nobles, and then the British kicked them while they were down at Trafalgar in 1805, so they had to rebuild after that. I know a lot less about the north African pirates, but I think they were based in lands protected by the Ottoman Empire, which was declining but still somewhat powerful. There were various expeditions against the pirates though, and a lot of times they could be "paid off." Anyway, once the Europeans defeated Napoleon and adopted a "balance of power" approach at the Congress of Vienna, they started colonizing Africa, and France grabbed most of modern Morocco, Algeria, and Tunisia, which I think is where most of the pirates were based. (Shamefully, the French also commited many atrocities while doing so.) The pirates in Libya I think were mostly reined in when the Ottoman Empire took direct control (instead of allowing them autonomy) around that time.

[–] Rolando@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Sounds interesting. Apparently there were in fact Mediterranean pirates until at least 1830: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbary_pirates

[–] Rolando@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Sauron had more than the concept of a plan.

 

Intro by Rolando: I recently compared Jim Woodring to @pmjv@lemmy.sdf.org's work on !unix_surrealism@lemmy.sdf.org, and @JohnnyEnzyme@lemm.ee suggested I post something here about it, since pmjv's European. So here is a cross-post of one of pmjv's more accessible pieces. For more info about what's going on, see: https://analognowhere.com/log/2022-04-30/

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/21198712

 

One of these links should work for you:

Looks like @clark@midwest.social started this a week ago. Examples of and discussions on the classic "The Outbursts of Everett True" 2-panel comics from the early 1900s, in which a portly man objects violently to everyday wrongdoing.

 

... I think learning about Nicholas II really contextualized fascism for me. The tsar was a traditionalist authoritarian rather than a fascist, but he really shows, I think, how ordinary people can hold totalitarian beliefs and still be ‘good people’ (note that I would never call the tsar a good person, but bear with me). Oftentimes people say “X is fascism” but quickly backpedal if real-world comparisons are drawn between family or friends. “They’re a good person!” they object, “Just misguided! Not like the other rubes!”

But Nicholas II shows the face of genuinely conservative authoritarianism. The face of the mediocre man, who puts no deeper thought into his beliefs than to parrot what he was raised with and stubbornly resist all challenge to that. He was not exceptionally cruel in terms of personality. I think probably a significant minority of ‘nice’ people, in Nicholas II’s circumstances, would have turned out just as big a piece of shit as he was. ...

see here for the full comment by @PugJesus: https://lemmy.world/comment/11418466

 

A cyberpunk story originally published in 1987! Kind of interesting to see that era's depictions of cybersecurity and AI.

view more: next ›