this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2024
598 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

58173 readers
3071 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

Yeah no shit.

[–] linearchaos@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Rule #1: anybody who can get you to give them your information of likes, dislikes just about anything will sell it to other people, or use it for their own sales to you.

Rule #2: If anyone has any reason to make you accept terms and conditions and there's any chance that they you may want to sue them in future, they're going to slip in a binding arbitration clause unless it is legally difficult for them to do so.

Wake up FTC it's not just social media it's deeply embedded everywhere in commerce and society and it needs to be addressed RFN.

[–] m3t00@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

anti-Social ones. this all public btw.

[–] KellysNokia@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

In idiom meta for this scenario, most Lemmy users are what would be considered 'the choir'

[–] harsh3466@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

FTC says water is wet.

Edit: in all seriousness, it’s good that the FTC is talking about this, and it’ll be even better if it does something to combat it.

[–] yemmly@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

I like that someone in a position of authority is talking about this.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 29 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Don't forget their 1427 trusted data partners!

[–] loutr@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

But it's their legitimate interest! ^Whatever ^that ^means

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 days ago
[–] noodlejetski@lemm.ee 67 points 2 days ago (15 children)

ITT: omg how other people don't see what I, a very smart and superior person who browses technology communities, have known for years

we should be celebrating that privacy issues are gaining more and more mainstream coverage.

[–] antmzo220@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

ITT: omg how other people don't see what I, a very smart and superior person who browses technology communities, have known for years

Genuinely, who doesn't know/suspect this, do you know anyone? I don't think it's about superiority at all.

I don't know literally anyone who doesn't know or atleast expect this, even normies have the concepts of NSA/Big Brother spying on everything.

Literally even my tech illiterate parents know/suspect that you aren't private anywhere.

Edit: and if you do know anyone who is ignorant to this...will they find this article/report and read it?

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It is fine to have casual knowledge of or a hunch about something, but far better to have the research and analysis to prove it.

[–] powermaker450@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 2 days ago

NO. REALLY?

[–] Prox@lemmy.world 53 points 2 days ago

That's literally the sales pitch to investors, and has been for decades.

[–] z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml 38 points 2 days ago (1 children)

We need you Lina Khan. We need you, but stronger, faster, better. Let's fucking go.

[–] 2pt_perversion@lemmy.world 41 points 2 days ago (3 children)

People in this thread don't seem to understand how anti big business the FTC has been since Lina Khan was appointed. These reports are meant to be used by congress to help guide real policy. It's one thing to just assume social media is violating privacy, it's another thing to have a facts-based report on exactly what is currently happening.

Of course the FTC needs new laws to do any enforcement and there's probably not enough anti corporation politicians to pass laws that give them real teeth on data privacy issues.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] potentiallynotfelix@lemdro.id 31 points 2 days ago

In other news, the sky is blue.

[–] aaaaace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 2 days ago
[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 36 points 2 days ago

Yeah, no shit!

[–] fubarx@lemmy.ml 19 points 2 days ago
[–] cjriebe@lemmy.riebe.cloud 20 points 2 days ago (2 children)

This is why I’m slowly migrating to the Fediverse.

Fuck social media companies.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 34 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

We're watching you too.

Now, entertain us, we are bored.

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 9 points 2 days ago

Yep, all they gotta do is well, very little.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Well, the Fediverse isn't any more private, but at least it doesn't care much about your data. That said, any company could come and harvest all of that data if it wanted since it's open.

The Fediverse isn't the final step here.

[–] cjriebe@lemmy.riebe.cloud 6 points 2 days ago

I understand that, but it's more about the targeted advertisements, sponsored posts, etc. Just give me my goddamn content and leave me alone LOL

[–] Rob200@lemmy.autism.place 16 points 2 days ago

They don't say.

[–] jeena@piefed.jeena.net 10 points 2 days ago

So this is why I switched to the fediverse. But to be honest, I have no idea if someone does things like that here or not. All my posts are public to everyone and machine readable. The only thing which would prevent someone of survailing users on the fediverse is it's very small scale. It is probably just not worth the effort.

[–] marlowe221@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Allow me to reveal my age by saying… No, duh!!!

[–] protist@mander.xyz 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)
load more comments
view more: next ›