this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2024
240 points (93.8% liked)

politics

19133 readers
5422 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lexam@lemmy.ca 192 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

That is an endorsement in of itself.

[–] dadGPT@lemmy.world 33 points 1 month ago (5 children)
[–] Pegajace@lemmy.world 78 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Not even. He officially left the Dems and registered as independent earlier this year.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 42 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I for one am very happy to rid the party of these scumbags: Manchin, Gabbard, Sinema.

[–] psvrh@lemmy.ca 35 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Depressingly, also Fetterman.

[–] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Fetterman is bad on Israel-Palestine but I thought he was otherwise ok re: democracy, women's rights, etc? Am I wrong? He's not my rep so I'm actually asking.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Gabbard and Sinema are people that can be replaced with other democrats, but let’s not fool ourselves into thinking a more progressive person would likely get elected for Manchin’s West Virginia seat.

Manchin may suck, but he caucuses with the dems and puts the dems 2 seats over the majority line. Which means his existence currently allows the Chuck Schumer to replace Mitch McConnell, which means the dems control what comes to the floor in the senate.

[–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They just can't pass anything. But yeah, it is still better than what the other side would bring to the floor.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Then re-registered as a Dem when Biden was about to drop out. Then re-re-registered as an Indie when he realized he wasn't going to get handed to nomination over Harris.

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 10 points 1 month ago

An independent now. Not even a DINO.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

More like a Dixiecrat. Old school southern Democrat.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Honestly, I’ll take it.

Dude could be a Home Depot Halloween skeleton for all I care. He caucuses with the Dems, which means that he helps push the Dems over 50% in the senate, which means the Dems control political appointments and what get brought to the floor.

I’ll take him over Mitch McConnell back in power.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 86 points 1 month ago (9 children)

The fact that Biden called for this exact same thing and Manchin was ok endorsing him but has to make a big scene when a non-white woman calls for doing the same thing basically tells you everything you need to know about Manchin

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Veedem@lemmy.world 40 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Why not just make the filibuster what it used to be and require the people who want to wield it to hold the floor for hours upon hours with no break? Some of it was silly. Some of it heroic. Either way, it required someone to truly be willing to stand behind their beliefs and, thus, was used much less often.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

I also liked the idea of a minority vote (2/5) to sustain a filibuster. If you don't have 40 supporters, on the floor, then the filibuster ends.

[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

it required someone to truly be willing to stand behind their beliefs

Conservatives don't typically have these, and the ones that do know how unpopular they are. That's why they fight against any attempt to reign it in.

[–] Chee_Koala@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

This seems like such a fair way to add some discomfort to filibustering and making it a bit less appealing.

[–] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 37 points 1 month ago

Oh no! Anyways…

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 29 points 1 month ago

Republicans can endorse Harris all day long and I'm here for it.

Manchin endorsing Harris would have actually done her a disservice.

[–] xantoxis@lemmy.world 29 points 1 month ago

Can someone kick this guy in the nuts? I don't really care about this news, I just think that should happen to him, every day.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Manchin was not going to endorse her anyway.

It's 42 days to the election, people are voting, if he was going to endorse her it would have been at the convention.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago

Oh wow, the republican infiltrator isnt supporting the democrats.

I'm sooooooooo surprised.

[–] jhymesba@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago (7 children)

I'd seen the quote, but not the withholding of endorsement. Well, I guess he's going to join the 'both sides bad' crowd.

Still. What does his opinion matter? He's leaving the Senate next year so his proper alt-Right replacement can take over...

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago
[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 16 points 1 month ago

Manchin LOL. What a piece of work.

He’s a fucking tool; I don’t expect she’ll care much. Also: what an absolutely fucking idiotic hill for him to die on.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

Like I give a flying fuck what Joe Manchin's DINO ass thinks

[–] Sirpantangelini@noauthority.social 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

@realcaseyrollins he's gunna endorse trump and could end up sec of energy

[–] realcaseyrollins@thelemmy.club 4 points 1 month ago

Oh boy...that would be something...

[–] randon31415@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

"It’s the only thing that keeps us talking ~~and~~ instead of working together."

[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Manchin not endorsing IS an endorsement. Harris should run commercials.

[–] 108@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Who cares about this dinosaur, like anyone is surprised?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

fuck that guy... fuck him with a retractable baton

[–] AtomicHotSauce@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

At LEAST twice. Possibly 47 times.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] draneceusrex@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Holy Grail? An item given no special meaning in the Bible, and was blown out of proportion in importance by fiction writers a thousand years later? I guess Manchin doesn't really think the filibuster is too important then.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

No special meaning and not in the Constitution.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Fuck Joe "This is the best we can hope for" Manchin.

And fuck the system that makes him the best we can hope for.

West Virginia used to be cool.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago

He likes his power

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

"I'm Kamala Harris, and I approve this message!"

[–] boaratio@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

This guy sucks.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Forced Birther coal baron Joe Manchin is upset at Harris for threatening his cash cow fillibuster. News at 11

load more comments
view more: next ›