this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2024
135 points (97.2% liked)

Political Weirdos

725 readers
3 users here now

A community dedicated to the weirdest people involved in politics.

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Article here:

It looks like a family holiday card except that the woman and children posing with Republican Derrick Anderson are not his wife or his offspring.

Anderson, who running in a close race for Virginia’s seventh congressional district, was seen in another image seated around the dining table with the same woman and three girls.

The images came to light in an article by The New York Times, headlined “G.O.P. Candidates, Looking to Soften Their Image, Turn to Their Wives,” which reported how “male Republicans struggling to appeal to female voters concerned about their records on reproductive rights are unleashing their spouses to make the pitch on their behalf.”

However Anderson, who is childless, engaged to be married and lives alone with his dog, sought to borrow the wife and children from a longtime friend in an apparent effort to appear as a family man.

A spokesman for Anderson criticized The New York Times for focusing on the footage and said that “Derrick’s opponent and every other candidate in America are in similar pictures and video with supporters of all kinds.” The spokesman said the video simply showed Anderson “with female supporters and their kids.”

However, comments by vice presidential candidate JD Vance making fun of “childless cat ladies” and a push by Republicans to roll back abortion rights have not been popular with the electorate.

In 2022, Anderson praised the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn the Roe v. Wade decision that provided women with abortion access, saying “SCOTUS finally got it right.”

His decision to pose with a family that was not his own was widely mocked on social media.

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] shyguyblue@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He probably picked her out of a binder...

[–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Still the highlight of romney's political career.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Are you sure?

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

Holy shit I thought this was an Onion article. Unfuckingbelievable.

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

Someone should Photoshop the actual husband's face on top of this weirdo.

[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"Hey, let me use all the ladies in your family so I can take away their rights."

-that douche noozle

[–] beebarfbadger@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

"Sure. But they're only on loan. I still retain all property rights."

[–] 667@lemmy.radio 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)
[–] Rolando@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's funny to see that family surrounded by such a great diversity of plants. I wonder how desirable that garden would be if it only grew one type of plant.

[–] radicalautonomy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Ooh, well-considered.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 month ago

The images came to light in an article by The New York Times, headlined “G.O.P. Candidates, Looking to Soften Their Image, Turn to Their Wives,” which reported how “male Republicans struggling to appeal to female voters concerned about their records on reproductive rights are unleashing their spouses to make the pitch on their behalf.”

The NYT has proven to be a shitshow ever since Oct 7. There were probably signs before that, but my eyes were opened after that.

[–] django@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 month ago

Next step: AI generated families.