"We live in an era of unmatched technological advancement in the field of small arms. I can't imagine what they'll be using a hundred years from now."
John Browning, struck with divine inspiration from the god of firearms: "I CAN"
this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2024
321 points (97.3% liked)
NonCredibleDefense
6622 readers
415 users here now
A community for your defence shitposting needs
Rules
1. Be nice
Do not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.
2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes
If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.
3. Content must be relevant
Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.
4. No racism / hatespeech
No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.
5. No politics
We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.
6. No seriousposting
We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.
7. No classified material
Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.
8. Source artwork
If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.
9. No low-effort posts
No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.
10. Don't get us banned
No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.
11. No misinformation
NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.
Join our Matrix chatroom
Other communities you may be interested in
- !militaryporn@lemmy.world
- !forgottenweapons@lemmy.world
- !combatvideos@sh.itjust.works
- !militarymoe@ani.social
Banner made by u/Fertility18
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I'm sure he'd be rolling over in his grave if he knew they added a safety to it.
Does the M2A1 have a safety? I thought they just gave it a quick swap barrel
Yeah, they were tired of people using spent brass lol. The biggest safety change on the a1 was fixed head space and timing though.
Colt 1911, accept no substitute.
Two world wars and still has a valid NSN.
Browning Hi-Power.
A gun so old they had to start callin it the Maw-Maw Deuce.
And when you have 2 Maw-Maws under the same roof, hellfire upon those who dare not to have a second plate.
Woe to the man who doesn't like sweet tea! Great shall be her anguish!
I don't think two plates of anything are going to stop .50 BMG
I've had the pleasure of using one, and the reasons for its continued use are many, but I'll list a few:
- Proven design that works well
- Ease of maintenance (except from that one bit you absolutely have to remember to flip forward before inserting the bolt carrier, lest you have to drill in from the side to file it off to unjam the bolt carrier)
- Objectively cool
- Adds three inches to your penis size (men), a couple of letters to the cup size (women), or either/both for anyone else
- NATO has literal tonns upon tones of ammo for it. Tha m82 shooter is sure as hell not removing the linked chains from all of it so he can carry it around himself.
Trying to think of what bit you have to flip...
Are you talking about the cocking lever? It needs to be pushed forward prior to pushing the bolt all the way forward into battery, because it catches in a notch at the top of the receiver in order to cock the firing pin (bolt goes back, lever flips forward, and vice versa). But if you put the bolt in with the cocking lever back, which people do a lot, the lever gets stuck on the timing arm attached to the receiver. Barely an inconvenience. But...
Did somebody jam that sumbitch in there so good that you had to destroy the motherfucker? Because that is fucking insane. That's like breaking a steel framing hammer. Like, I get it, but... How!?
It's been 20 years since I lasted opened an m2, so I don't remember exactly, but the part I'm talking about is a fairly nondescript metal piece sticking up from the bolt carrier. I may remember it incorrectly that it has to be back and not forward.
Also, the drill + file is what I was told. I never saw it happen.
They're still using Maxim guns in Ukraine.
Liquid cooled guns on a fixed position will shoot and shoot and shoot and shoot and shoot and shoot and shoot and shoot and shoot as long as they have ammo and some water in the sleeve. They are really good guns for ww1 style trench warfare.
I'm reminded when a British battalion had to get rid of all their old Vickers ammo, and ran it through their old Vickers gun. I think they said they did like 2 million rounds and had 2 issues total.
They are amazing machines. Just heavy as fuck.
Really, the only thing "wrong" with them is that they're heavy as fuck. But if you're not moving, that's not a problem
Or if ya mount them on the bed of a Toyota hilux.
As is tradition.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M2_Browning
Apparently at one point -- I assume during the war -- Frigidaire, of all companies, was manufacturing M2 Brownings.
kagis
Apparently they made quite a few, actually:
https://usautoindustryworldwartwo.com/General%20Motors/frigidaire.htm
Frigidaire Division of GM World War Two Products: 363,000 .50 Caliber Browning M2 Aircraft Machine Guns, 1,000,000 spare .50 Caliber Machine Gun Barrels...Frigidaire engineers made over 500 design and manufacturing changes to reduce the cost of the machine gun to 25% of the original cost, using mass manufacturing techniques.
EDIT:
Apparently in 2015, some active-duty unit sent in M2 Browning Serial #324 for maintenance. This was the first time it had ever been sent in for maintenance.
https://www.army.mil/article/150794/Making_the_old_like_new
In more than 90 years of existence, the receiver with serial number 324 has never been overhauled.
"Looking at the receiver, for its age, it looks good as new and it gauges better than most of the other weapons," said John Clark, a small arms repair leader.
While there are many small bits of nuance from gun to gun, they mostly share a fairly straightforward design that doesn't have some groundbreaking design possibilities waiting in the wings. The Browning was built to be very reliable, has a lot of spare parts, and is maintained in an environment that stresses consistency. Yeah, they are going be to around for a very, very long time.
It is funny to find out that they were almost dropped by the military early on because they didn't live up to the niche they were originally designed for. As long as they are useful they will be around.
Well, as long as most of us are still squishy bags of mostly water, Ma Deuce will still be effective. Even if you’re wearing body armor a 50 cal is going to ruin your day. It’s old, but it still punches holes effectively.
Any piece of military hardware that can outlast the B-52 is probably doing something right.
That race is still on though.
True, but the B-52's got a successor coming in, and nothing's waiting in the wings for the M2.
The B52 was replaced by the B-1 Lancer in 1973, and then it was replaced again by the B-2 Spirit in 1987.
And yet it's still here.
Whoa there we absolutely replaced the M2. We got the M2A1.
Well, the receiver got an update, but if you're gonna count that as a replacement, the B-52 has had a lot of updates too.
That's the joke
too late and too early are flipped.
Its one of those tools that just doesn't need to change, like a claw hammer or a monkey wrench.
Yep, definitely the cocking lever. Good job to the meathead who accomplished what nature could not!
Forgotten Weapons talking about its history, including why it's still around: