this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2024
338 points (98.6% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

9747 readers
301 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The truth is, it’s getting harder to describe the extent to which a meaningful percentage of Americans have dissociated from reality. As Hurricane Milton churned across the Gulf of Mexico last night, I saw an onslaught of outright conspiracy theorizing and utter nonsense racking up millions of views across the internet. The posts would be laughable if they weren’t taken by many people as gospel. Among them: Infowars’ Alex Jones, who claimed that Hurricanes Milton and Helene were “weather weapons” unleashed on the East Coast by the U.S. government, and “truth seeker” accounts on X that posted photos of condensation trails in the sky to baselessly allege that the government was “spraying Florida ahead of Hurricane Milton” in order to ensure maximum rainfall, “just like they did over Asheville!”

As Milton made landfall, causing a series of tornados, a verified account on X reposted a TikTok video of a massive funnel cloud with the caption “WHAT IS HAPPENING TO FLORIDA?!” The clip, which was eventually removed but had been viewed 662,000 times as of yesterday evening, turned out to be from a video of a CGI tornado that was originally published months ago. Scrolling through these platforms, watching them fill with false information, harebrained theories, and doctored images—all while panicked residents boarded up their houses, struggled to evacuate, and prayed that their worldly possessions wouldn’t be obliterated overnight—offered a portrait of American discourse almost too bleak to reckon with head-on.

Even in a decade marred by online grifters, shameless politicians, and an alternative right-wing-media complex pushing anti-science fringe theories, the events of the past few weeks stand out for their depravity and nihilism. As two catastrophic storms upended American cities, a patchwork network of influencers and fake-news peddlers have done their best to sow distrust, stoke resentment, and interfere with relief efforts. But this is more than just a misinformation crisis. To watch as real information is overwhelmed by crank theories and public servants battle death threats is to confront two alarming facts: first, that a durable ecosystem exists to ensconce citizens in an alternate reality, and second, that the people consuming and amplifying those lies are not helpless dupes but willing participants...

... “The primary use of ‘misinformation’ is not to change the beliefs of other people at all. Instead, the vast majority of misinformation is offered as a service for people to maintain their beliefs in face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary”...

... As one dispirited meteorologist wrote on X this week, “Murdering meteorologists won’t stop hurricanes.” She followed with: “I can’t believe I just had to type that”...

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] zigzag@lemmus.org 61 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is where truth is crazier then fiction, but perhaps we can begin to get to grips with it.

How to avoid a techno-apocalypse brought on by the internet. Talks of several books where this is a core part of the plot.

THE nuclear blast that takes out Moab, Utah, in Neal Stephenson’s 2019 novel Fall; or, Dodge in Hell is “epistemic ground zero”. That is because it doesn’t actually happen. It is an online-only 9-11, a viral conspiracy theory that becomes the fault line along which the US fractures in two.

On one side, the people who believe that Moab is a no-go zone, and that the event has been covered up by swamp-dwelling politicians. On the other, the people who can freely travel to Moab to see the town is untouched.

The know-nothing side of the US devolves into Mad Max anarchy, becoming a no-go zone in its own right, which Stephenson brands Ameristan. The rest continue unimpeded into the technological future.

The book is one of many recent ones that tackle one of the questions of our time. As comedian Ronny Chieng put it in his Netflix special: “Who knew all of human knowledge could make people dumber?”

[–] eightpix@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Doppelganger by Naomi Klein.

The Age of American Unreason by Susan Jacoby

These books really helped me to see how and why some of these people go this way.

[–] zigzag@lemmus.org 2 points 1 month ago

Thanks, I'll add them and look forward to it.

My distilled understanding is that we are not psychological well built by evolution for this much information in the forms we now have technological. When you take our cognitive biases--which makes us persuadable--and couple that with a degenerating lack of taught fundamental critical thinking skills, it leads to irrational choices and mindsets which are not accounted for in our governing systems, let alone cultures, and economic. Indeed the latter point is that the capitalist system has a fiduciary responsibly to take advantage of any niche and exploit it, which has been let loose due to deregulation in various forms. Executive have little moral incentive to not be evil and instead to manipulate people in whatever manner best suits their shareholders. All of this creates echo chambers and self-reinforcing irrational behavior.

Obviously there is much more to it, but this is the elevator pitch version... Which I look forward to comparing against the books you indicated, plus any correction you might add.

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 23 points 1 month ago

To a degree, I can’t blame people for reacting this way. It’s either disassociate (which is bad), or face the reality that we have severely damaged the biosphere (which is much worse). The latter might also include accepting that you made the wrong political choices, which, by itself, is virtually impossible for a lot of people.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

that the people consuming and amplifying those lies are not helpless dupes but willing participants...

Ah yes, the willing participants who tweak the algorithms to show them the most enraging hyper personalized garbage there is.

Wait those might be different people.

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

Algorithms will show you what you like and what others like you like. That's it. I got Muslim dating apps all day every day because I lived in London, but I never clicked, so it went away. It didn't convert me to islam, just like seeing a church outside didn't make me Christian because I'm semi-capable of at least some thought and not purely instinctual animalistic behaviour as you imply is the case for those who are led by algorithms.

As I said before, the internet is simply airing out our dirty laundry. Humans are bloodthirsty ghouls most of the time and will believe whatever it takes to justify killing each other.

In the context of WW2 for instance Hitler is the "bad guy", but compared to some of the shit Churchill got up to for instance with the Bengali, he seemed fairly civilised, and even that would've seemed soft compared to Stalin's purges and the Holodomor, but say what you will - none of them had Jim Crow laws.

Im not trying to say all are equal, but more that it's not at all surprising so many seem downright evil

[–] mayo@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They are tweaked to improve engagement, not at all as vanilla as that.

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Yeah what's engagement? Interactions. The winning move is not to play the game. I've yet to hear reasons why this is more difficult than e.g. stopping littering on the street or eating junk food.

[–] mayo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Engagement and retention are both important. If the solution to retention is to walk away then the solution to engagement is to not be engaged that doesn't track to me. Maybe the idea is to avoid phones, the internet and TV entirely which is not an idea that is grounded in reality.

This one is less interesting to me for some reason, I think it's an easier assumption to make or maybe it's that the argument about harmful algorithms gained traction over a decade ago.

This is an earlier paper but is a solid primer that touches on it

The researchers positively showed that news and updates on Face-­‐ book influence the tenor of the viewing Facebook-­‐user’s subsequent posts

Here's an entire book about it or an article.

Social media addiction has emerged as a problem of global concern, with researchers all over the world conducting studies to evaluate how pervasive the problem is.

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

I don't question that Facebook et al optimize for retention and engagement. I don't question they're also successful, I know all these things.

What I don't understand is why?

Dr.Pepper was also very successful in getting me hooked as a teenager with his much less sophisticated tactics of sugar and soapy cherry-flavoured delights, however I stopped that, it wasn't that hard compared to other basic day to day things in life like having to get up for work or brushing my teeth, compared to finding a job there's basically no comparison.

Flash forward to 2018, I had every corporate product a techie would have, now I have almost nothing trendy at all. So I wonder why when I say I'm leaving a platform because of its shady practices e.g. advertising or algorithms I just go ahead and do, but others cannot simply do so. I don't use corpo/algo social media, I've unsubscribed from almost all the streaming services, on the internet I block all ads, on websites I don't know I block JavaScript altogether, I bypass paywalls, I block known trackers, I don't pay for media and torrent everything.

The question is why?

How can I take my seemingly unusual ability to just let go despite being exposed to the same algorithms etc and give it to others?

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

For the Internet as a whole, perhaps. For Meta platforms and equivalent - this is factually false. They do not simply show you what you like. Far from it. You should read up on it if you haven't.

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

Are you implying that Facebook et al do not optimise for engagement? What do they optimise for then?

[–] flying_wotsit@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago (17 children)

To elaborate on what others have replied already, the algorithms will show you what will keep you on the platform, not what you like. Optimising for this means keeping you angry, not happy. Angry and divided people stick around so they can tell the other side how wrong they are (or watch their favourite pundit do that for them)

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 2 points 1 month ago

You seem to be implying everyone is you and knows what you know or are as "rational"

Like you reduce other people to animals and also assume they are not being tricked or pushed into more radical beliefs because.. Ehh?

Your nuanced take is not a take at all. It's just you touting superiority.

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I saw an onslaught of outright conspiracy theorizing and utter nonsense racking up millions of views across the internet.

Another problem is, this (what you are personally being presented with, view counts) is also just something your screen is presenting to you to be taken at face value as reality. Might be better to give up on social media entirely as a reliable source of information.

[–] Fox@pawb.social 16 points 1 month ago (2 children)

This isn't so different from how it always was. Before social media existed in its modern form, Alex Jones used to broadcast from a 100kW shortwave station. The chem trail nonsense goes back almost thirty years. I suspect the spiritual origin is traceable back to 60s counterculture. Snake Oil type scams and witch doctors go back to prehistory.

The biggest difference is that people can now engage directly with these things immediately and worldwide, they don't have to be part of an alternative magazine mailing list.

[–] Orbituary@lemmy.world 29 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

You seem to be unintentionally equivocating the existence of what used to be fringe but has now become mainstream. You're diminishing the very core of the issue by saying "it's nothing new."

Crackpots used to be isolated and thought of as fools because they lacked a cohort. Their hare-brained ideas were dismissed as nonsense without repercussions or worries that it might be disenfranchising someone's right to believe falsehoods. Now, they can find support in bolstered numbers, each falling in line behind their respective mouthpiece of absurdity.

And here we are: the rest of the world standing around mouths agape because we cannot do shit about it.

[–] Fox@pawb.social 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I still consider them fringe, they're just now much more visible than they were before. I'm not trying to say that it's not an in issue either.

These crackpots have always had an audience when they see returns.

The antidote is going outside, engaging with things and people you disagree with, and being a skeptic of your own beliefs. I was actually an Alex Jones listener way way back when Bush was president. There was this guy who superficially cared about civil rights and was railing against a government that operated in secret, and a lot of the appeals made sense - until you realized that his prophecies failed one after the next, and he was really just on the air to sell dick pills.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

That Trump has rarely polled under 40-45%...after everything (and there has been so, so much)...strongly suggests there is a sizable number of Americans utterly detached from reality.

[–] Benjaben@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The biggest difference is that ...

But that's an enormous difference, and it seems like it may push us to a place of crisis before it gets better. None of the tactics are new, they're not even new to the modern era. But the reach is new, and it has enabled the creation of a large and broadly distributed group, that is thoroughly detached from and increasingly hostile toward mainstream society. With every indication that they are getting more entrenched, not less.

Aside from how spread out they can be, a group like that's not new either, and basic intuition and history both point to this being a dangerous situation brewing. We really gotta figure out how to reach one another again.

[–] sic_semper_tyrannis@lemmy.today 13 points 1 month ago (8 children)

People are so distrustful of our government and institutions of power that they are looking for information elsewhere for better or for worse. The ordinary citizen is not to blame. They are being forced fed tailored information through legacy media, social media, and everything else and can't figure out what is true. This is the same for people from all sides of the political spectrum. Your frustrations should be focused on the powers who sow this misinformation into our reality for nefarious reasons.

[–] darthelmet@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Yeah. It’s not hard to see why people don’t trust the media anymore. Amongst other things, the big ones I can think about in my life: They uncritically parroted lies the government used to justify the Iraq War and they regularly gave equal air time/consideration to climate deniers as though they were equivalent to climate scientists.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

I'm pretty sure I've just become desensitized to most of the outrage.

load more comments
view more: next ›