this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2024
75 points (86.4% liked)

politics

19098 readers
4885 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Hegar@fedia.io 44 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I really don't have a problem with this. She's a center right candidate from a center right party - of course she'll make an appeal to center right voters.

Sure, I wish we had a left wing candidate or a left wing party. But you can't vote in the election you want, you vote in the election you've got.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There's no point appealing to the fascists. They prefer the better fascist.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 month ago

Working with fascists gives fascists power. And fascists have money to give to centrists to move further right.

Why else would they not want money? It's not like lives at home are in danger, the lives abroad clearly don't matter much.

[–] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

And she's inviting the actual right into the party. So now we can have our conservative party and our batshit crazy party. No need to even talk about progressive policies! Yay!

Somehow R destroying themselves resulted in a loss for the left. R just gets to join D and it's all good, high fives and hugs, despite who they voted for and supported since 2016, despite their continued assault on the queer community, despite their rampant overt bigotry and racism.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Sure, I wish we had a left wing candidate or a left wing party. But you can’t vote in the election you want, you vote in the election you’ve got.

Exactly. This is billionaire media controlled America. We don't get to have a left wing party, we get a "left wing" relative to the rightmost wing party which also goes and calls their so-called left wing opposition communist... It's laughably absurd.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

America is a center-right country. Anyone on the left will always be unhappy.

[–] Hegar@fedia.io 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

We have a strongly right leaning elite and a government that was never designed to represent the will of the majority is how I would put it.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

That is a lot nicer than admitting we’re actually in the minority.

[–] BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Leftists are a minority in name only. If capitalists didn't work tirelessly to paint anything beneficial to the working class as "evil communism", the majority of Americans would support policies that benefit them.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

The longer I live the less I believe that

[–] Hegar@fedia.io 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Almost every poll that I've seen for ~20 years which asks about policies shows that most left wing positions have at least 50-60% support.

There was a great study years back from princeton looking at the difference between policy outcomes and public preferences at the time. They concluded the US has been an oligarchy since at least the 70s, since no major policy outcome has matched public opinion.

The farthest right faction of our elites are currently pulling so far to the right of the population that the flimsy theatre of representation we have now is actually proving a barrier. Republicans wouldn't be supressing votes if people wanted their ideas.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Left wing positions like Medicare for All or left wing positions like converting all corporations into worker cooperatives?

[–] Hegar@fedia.io 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I haven't seen any opinion polls on abolishing heirarchy yet.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago

Maybe they've tried but every call ended with them being called a commie and hung up on.

[–] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Time for republicans to prove they aren't the party of fascists.

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 9 points 1 month ago

Yeah, I'll be be waiting with baited breath...

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Why? They just have to hold out until Democrats become fascists to appeal to them.

[–] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Won't happen, bothsideism is horse shit.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago

Which is why the "good" party has adopted Republicans' policies on genocide and the border.

Centrists are just itching to move right.

[–] anticolonialist@lemmy.world -4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They've already done that and that's why the Republicans are flocking to them.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I wouldn't say "flocking" but they got Cheney and Bush on board, and they're so proud that they moved far enough to the right to get there.

[–] anticolonialist@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago

They've bragged about over 200 republicans

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)
[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)

To be fair, if you're still an "undecided" voter at this point, you're an oblivious (or single-issue) idiot at best, and a dishonest person taking advantage of workers at worst.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm not even sure I understand the meme. It feels like the last section was supposed to be something further left than liberal like "uncommitted". I'm sure the campaign thinks "we'll be both parties" is also supposed to appeal to undecided voters.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

yeah thats what I should have put.

[–] djsoren19@yiffit.net 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I just refuse to believe this will work. Harris' plan is seriously to try and court die-hard "Always-Republicans" by hoping that the group who chooses a candidate because it's what their parents voted for will have the critical thinking skills to realize Donald Trump is unfit for the presidency.

Meanwhile, every little thing like this makes it harder and harder for leftists to stomach her. None of this motivates any Democrats to go to the polls and cast a vote for her. You can criticize a lot about Trump's campaign, but they're focused on the only thing that matters; energizing their supporters to vote.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is the same thing Hillary did in 2016. "Trump is bad. Therefore, you have to vote for me." I mean, the identical rhetoric has already shown its ineffective head in this thread.

Its always the voters that are wrong. The party or candidate can never fail; it can only be failed.

[–] anticolonialist@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And they've been priming the media with supposed Russia and China misinformation so they can point fingers and blame when they lose.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Yup. They would rather lose democracy forever and have someone to blame than even consider abandoning their support for genocide.

[–] wildncrazyguy138@fedia.io 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

As the Dark Sith Lord Mitchell McConnell once stated: “winning is the only thing that matters, winning means you have the power, winning means you get to make the rules.” (Paraphrasing)

If you want left wing policies, like Obamacare or the inflation reduction act, if you want the green new deal or Medicare for all, then the left have to be in power. Else it’s a crapshoot what we get (hey, republicans were the ones that put the D in Medicare).

It’s not that hard of a concept. Lefties will continue to do lefty things when they have the power and votes to do so.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

If you want left wing policies, like Obamacare or the inflation reduction act, if you want the green new deal or Medicare for all, then the left have to be in power.

The left isn't running in this election.

Lefties will continue to do lefty things when they have the power and votes to do so.

How many more majorities do we have to give them before we can call this out for the disgusting lie it is?

[–] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 6 points 1 month ago

"One is a fascist, one doesn't say they support my opinion, another one will split the vote and give the fascist victory. It's so hard to choose man."

-literally nobody.

It'd be nice if she didn't need to do this, but the current reality is that we need the centralists. A couple of old, but good articles, which explain why: https://www.vox.com/the-big-idea/2016/11/22/13713148/electoral-college-democracy-race-white-voters & https://www.vox.com/the-big-idea/2018/1/29/16945106/democrats-white-working-class-demographics-alabama-clinton-obama-base

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -3 points 1 month ago

The Hill - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for The Hill:

MBFC: Least Biased - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://thehill.com/homenews/4937357-harris-gop-campaign-support/
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support