this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2024
142 points (96.1% liked)

News

37762 readers
3170 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Microplastics have been identified in the water we drink, the air we breathe and the food we eat – including seafood, table salt, honey, sugar, beer and tea. Sometimes the contamination occurs in the environment. Other times it’s the result of food processing, packaging and handling. More data is needed on microplastics in human foods such as land-animal products, cereals, grains, fruits, vegetables, beverages, spices, and oils and fats.

As equipment has advanced, scientists have identified smaller particles. They’ve found microplastics in our lungs, livers, kidneys, blood and reproductive organs. Microplastics have crossed protective barriers into our brains and hearts. While we eliminate some microplastics through urine, faeces and our lungs, many persist in our bodies for a long time.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 38 points 2 years ago

We are doomed. We get it. Nothing will be done about it because oil and gas has so much money.

[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 23 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I had an eco prof who once said, "the world created humans because it couldn't figure out plastic itself." Now the world has plenty of plastic and it doesn't need us anymore.

[–] Notyou@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 years ago

I was thinking something similar. Like if a "God" exist they would be like a programmer that set us up and then let us run. Why? They wanted us to transform the world into a plastic hellscape. After that it would be "terrafromed" (plasti-formed?) for whatever will be the evolutionary descendants of those bacteria that are eating the microplastics in the Pacific Garbage patch.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Plastic is the new asbestos.

[–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
[–] Linktank@lemmy.today 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Watch out guys, we're on notice now!

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

I wish the title weren't so clickbaity... the article is actually very good and written by a top researcher in the field.

[–] Paddzr@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Can someone explain to me like I'm 10 years old why micro plastics are bad and what will happen to my body?

[–] comador@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

Micros plastics in the body screw with your organs and hormone production, which can lead to things as mild as lower energy levels and increased obesity or as extreme as diabetes, infertility and even cancer.

[–] Notyou@sopuli.xyz 10 points 2 years ago

No, but only cause we are just starting to notice the build up. Think about it this way. There's something building up in our body that doesn't have a purpose other than getting in the way other functions.

That is the least destructive it will be to our bodies. Functions will be worse because plastic is taking the place of valuable nutrients or microbotical gut biome. Or it's just in the way and that brain to cells message take a bit longer. Butterfly effect stuff all over your body on a micro level.

We can't even really run proper comparisons because we don't have a control group. Literally every living creature has this build up. The only way someone will have less micro plastics is if they give birth. The act of growing human cells moves some plastic from the mother to the baby. It's all a guess, but of course that's science. Now is the "fun" part of proving what theories are true.....somehow.

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

I feel it will likely be similar to asking why asbestos was bad but hundred years ago.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

There are some specific medical issues we’ve found, but evidence is “emerging”.

Micro plastics are bad because of their ubiquity and they never degrade (within human lifetime). Everything you eat, drink, breathe is contaminated with microplastics. They accumulate throughout your body and will stay for your lifetime. Similar for all plant and animal life. Researchers have even found microplastics within newborns. You can’t avoid them. You can’t get rid of them. At this scale, any impact becomes bad

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

but think of the shareholders in the oil industry!

[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

If you get to 100% micro plastics by body weight you become inmortal.