this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2024
107 points (95.7% liked)

politics

19091 readers
3802 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Firebrand Republican Rep. Lauren Boebert abandoned her re-election bid in western Colorado to move her family across the state and run in an entirely new, more conservative district. She won the primary, and the race is considered a GOP lock – but local Democrats insist there is a silent majority hoping for a shock upset

all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] frickineh@lemmy.world 60 points 2 weeks ago

If there's a silent majority, they've never bothered voting before now, so I don't see an upset happening.

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 39 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Carpet bagging beetle juicer. I hope the local Dems are right. She is a bigot and an embarrassment.

[–] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 23 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Oh right right didn’t she play with her boyfriend at a family event? Shouldn’t that have landed them on a sort of list???

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 30 points 2 weeks ago

Hypocrisy, inappropriate sex situation, playing the victim, and false outrage? It did land her on a list: The ideal Republican candidate list

[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm in her old district, she wouldve lost here. The new district next door is a little more red but she is personally not very popular anywhere around here. She very well may have worn out her welcome completely.

[–] runner_g@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 2 weeks ago

I'm in her new district, and I don't see many yard signs for her out here. I, for one, am excited to vote against her.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 38 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

She's not a fucking firebrand. Nobody goes "Oh, Boebie is making a speech its hype time!" Nobody is revolting over what she says and does. She is stirring nothing but her own pot of bad reputation. Firebrands inflame things in a way that leads to action, and not just the action of busting a nut during a theatrical performance.

[–] ATDA@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

More along the lines of "That one bullhorn that always screeches and the trigger is stuck on so you have to undo the battery" brand Lauren Boebert ...

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 30 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I kept wondering how the absolute scumbags of Congress keep getting reelected and then this comes along... Of course. She would normally get kicked out of Congress but she keeps moving so she can continue to be a piece of shit that never goes away...

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 8 points 2 weeks ago

That's how Darrell Issa got back too after his district finally got tired of his shenanigans. He moved to a more ~~racist~~ red area.

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 18 points 2 weeks ago

Listen to what the flower people say

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 12 points 2 weeks ago

She must really like not working for years, and still getting a salary and healthcare.

[–] Cyclist@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

Boebert is a total chicken shit.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Calverese raised nearly five times the amount Boebert did between July and September 30, a whopping almost $2.7m in contrast to the congresswoman’s $532,000.

“Keep in mind, actually the highest percent of voters in this district are unaffiliated,” she adds, noting that she’s “absolutely” targeting that bloc. “So people are thinking beyond the party paradigm … we’ve been doing meet-and-greets all throughout the district

[–] 21Cabbage@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 2 weeks ago

At the very least I'm cool with not having her as my rep anymore, wish it was in a 'getting out of politics' context but I'll take what I can get.