this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2024
66 points (92.3% liked)

politics

19086 readers
3984 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

The recent U.S. election saw a significant Democratic underperformance, with Kamala Harris drawing 1.4 million fewer votes than Joe Biden in 2020, while Donald Trump gained 1.1 million additional votes.

Nationally, Democrats lost more votes than Republicans gained, but in key swing states like Arizona, Georgia, and Pennsylvania, Trump’s gains outpaced Harris’s losses, securing his victory.

In many counties, Democratic votes dropped sharply even where Republican gains were modest.

Higher turnout in swing states, driven by Trump supporters, was a crucial factor in his win.

top 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 31 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

In a way Trump's vote stayed flat too. He didn't get that many votes more than last time. Meaning he does have a hard ceiling. Problem was that Harris received less votes in certain segments than Biden, mostly men.

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I don't think so. The total number of votes didn't change much, but it isn't like the exact same people from 2020 came out for him again. He made massive gains in black and Hispanic voters, for example, so his base isn't necessarily capped yet.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 19 points 4 days ago (3 children)

In 2020, Biden received 81,284,666 votes, Trump 74,224,319.

Last Tuesday Harris received 69,119,332 votes, Trump 73,461,159.

[–] fafferlicious@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

But if you look at the swing states that resulted in her loss, MI, WI, PA the votes are comparable to 2020.

(Votes in millions) MI: 2.80 Trump - 2.72 Harris vs 2.65 Trump vs 2.80 Biden WI: 1.70 Trump - 1.67 Harris vs 1.61 Trump vs 1.63 Biden PA: 3.51 trump - 3.44 Harris vs 3.38 Trump vs 3.46 Biden

Yes, Harris got generally fewer votes (Though not in WI). If Trump performed exactly as he did in 2020, Harris would have won. Trump did better. More people said "yes I want Trump" or more people turned out to vote to make sure it was "too big to steal"

If those numbers are "trumps votes stayed flat too" then, Harris receiving a similar number of votes to Biden in 2020 is flat too, right?

Like yeah there was an enthusiasm gap that seems pretty clear from the popular vote. But if you just look at the must win states it wasn't as far as what the nationwide popular vote would sugget. I think the safest conclusion to draw is Repubs were more energized to beat the fictional steal, and for some asinine reason some anti-trump voters went "...eh..Harris isn't good enough for my vote so we'll risk a fascist winning."

Yeah trump did better with young men, but I don't like % point comparisons like they show. If dem voters don't show up, it appears like Trump "wins". There were definitely articles where it was clearly he was picking up iconically reliable blue votes - Black and Latinos specifically. I think it's more just that people are hurting. The economy sucks for them and has for the past 12+ years. Even considering increased wages, it's still costing ridiculous more to exist.

The only shot the Dems had of not having that around their neck is an actually open primary. Biden needed to stick to what he said he was going to be - a bridge to the next generation. But he didn't. And then hung on top long where the only logical step with three months to go was Kamala. Even if a snap primary on all 50 states could happen again in a month, all the headlines would be "DEMS SKIP OVER CLEARLY QUALIFIED BLACK WOMAN -ARE THEY RACIST?"

Politics is messy. Dems needed a dem candidate. They've asininely let Republicans become the agents of change. The people that will shake things up. Fight the establishment. And it doesn't matter they don't actually do that, most voters are low info. The Democratic party needs to get people back on the picket line. Fight more. Go after business more. Swing for the fences and lose. Propose a negative income tax bracket. Yeah it's more conservative bullshit from the Reagan era, but it's a decent fucking alternative to UBI which doesn't have the broad appeal.

2020 Data 2024 Data

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

And it doesn’t matter they don’t actually do that, most voters are low info.

But, apparently, they will do that more than Dems. But just a bit.

There were definitely articles where it was clearly he was picking up iconically reliable blue votes - Black and Latinos specifically. I think it’s more just that people are hurting. The economy sucks for them and has for the past 12+ years.

People also don't like educated well-off white liberals graciously descending to ask for their lowly votes, to bring these poor bastards to some democratic heaven, but that's not certain. A lot of those people are, ahem, still kinda Christian and still kinda conservative, like second generation immigrants from Catholic Latin American countries. In any case this kind of condescending attitude tends to be unpopular. Especially when those promises haven't been fulfilled in the past.

[–] Blackbeard@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

There are still millions of uncounted votes in CA. Trump has gone from 72.6 million yesterday morning to 73.4 million today. Y'all really need to stop quoting these numbers as if they're anything but preliminary.

edit: Knee-jerk downvoting of a factual correction. Class act right here. Screen shot for those who have poor vision and/or analytical reasoning skills...

edit 2: Up to 74.8 million Trump votes and 71.2 million Harris votes now, and counting.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (3 children)

There are 93,000 uncounted votes in Calfornia today. Hardly a spit in the ocean to this point.

[–] Blackbeard@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

2.5 million additional votes since this lovely chat, just for everyone's edification. Ain't math fun!!!

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

But. That doest matter, for those that dislike rabbit hole arguements.

[–] Blackbeard@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

...but prefer factual accuracy.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Such a meaningless excuse for lack of reason.

[–] Blackbeard@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And an inability to admit a simple mistake.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You remind me 9f one of my former wives, and why she's former.

[–] Blackbeard@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That certainly explains why there's multiple...

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

She was bipolar and would rant for days. Usually, because I wouldn't play her game. Sad, that she had to battle her demons that way, but there it is. My first wife died of a stroke in front of me, but do amuse yourself with your fantasies

[–] Blackbeard@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Totally normal and well adjusted men refer to their dead wife as "former". Totally.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Now you question a death? Empathy must be dead. And yes, former is a way to identify.

In any case, you are very close to the end of your shelf life with me. If your wish is for me to block you, just say the word. Then you can scream to the wind.

[–] Blackbeard@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

I genuinely don't care what insular tactics you use to avoid admitting you made an elementary school math error. Just remember 93,000 does not equal 5,400,000 and everything will work out just as it should!

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It's way more than 93,000.

Running from the Google results page that quotes the AP:

58% reporting

Kamala Harris 57.6% 6,108,150 votes
Donald Trump 39.8% 4,216,520 votes
Robert Kennedy 1.1% 116,628 votes
Jill Stein 0.8% 87,842 votes
Chase Oliver 0.4% 39,805 votes
Claudia De la Cruz 0.4% 37,673 votes

So, adding that all up, this 58% is 10,606,618 votes.

So 58/10,606,618 vs 100/x Solve for x.

10,606,618 x 100 / 58 = Around 18,287,272 votes total.

Meaning about 7,680,654 votes still to count.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Which is still meaningless to the point. But, thanks for your input.

[–] Blackbeard@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Still can't admit you were wrong?

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago

Bwhahaha. Still has nothing to do. With the point of my first messages in this string.

[–] Blackbeard@lemmy.world -2 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] Blackbeard@lemmy.world -3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That's exactly the same link I just provided for you. Are you trolling?

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Didn't read it as a link from you. Using tablet.

[–] Blackbeard@lemmy.world -2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Scroll down to the bottom of the page and please try to math better if you're going to respond again. This is getting frustrating.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world -2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

When get around to it. Meanwhile, you can tell me how these missing votes change Trump's ceiling or Harris underperformance. You are only changing conditions, nothing more,

[–] Blackbeard@lemmy.world -2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

This is what I said:

Y’all really need to stop quoting these numbers as if they’re anything but preliminary.

Don't put words in my mouth.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

In other words, meaningless to the point. Thanks for your input.

[–] Blackbeard@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Sorry you can't process a single number on a spreadsheet. Must be hard.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Sorry if you cannot define a salient fact.

[–] Blackbeard@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Fact: Millions of votes have not been counted.

Fact: You're physically incapable of admitting you were mistaken by several orders of magnitude.

Facts don't care about your feelings. Read more carefully next time.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

It.makes.no.difference

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 1 points 4 days ago

Oh he does, he does.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 18 points 4 days ago

We can't out trump trump.

His voters might answer a poll that they like the Dem agrees with trump now, but they'll never vote D.

Chasing them just pisses off actual Dem voters, which leads to them not voting.

It's literally the same as Charlie Brown trying to kick that fucking football. Except in this case our lives hinge on making a fucking field goal, and someone pays Charlie Brown to keep letting Lucy hold the ball and pretending to be surprised.

[–] chakan2@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I have yet to get a positive on this...Does anyone know anyone that sat this election out personally? I'm not judging, I just want to hear someone say yes.

[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yep, talked to an old coworker from GA the day before. Got "neither party will help me". Doesn't take the threat from Trump seriously. I won't be talking to that person again.

[–] chakan2@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Thanks...see my comment above.

I kept getting the internet stories regurgitated at me rather than first hand knowledge. It's statistically unlikely out of the 50-100 Democrats I know, none of them sat this out. It's 1 in 7 by last count, I should know someone...

Anyway, thanks for proving me wrong.

[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

The biggest and most painful lesson I've learned this week is that the average American is a bad person, even within my friends and family. Being a decent human being in America is an exception. They knew and didn't care. The ones who sat out and the ones who voted for this truly deserve all the pain coming their way.

[–] IMongoose@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

It seems really localized. My county had almost 80% of registered voters vote, which seems crazy high to me.

[–] Aviandelight@mander.xyz 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yes a few of my male friends did. One was typical genx "meh" and the others just hated Kamala because she's a woman. Honestly it's disgusting.

[–] chakan2@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Thanks. Ok...I guess we did sit this one out. I was hoping I could bank on election fraud over the US being a giant turd of indifference...but alas.

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Yep, although he was gonna vote for Trump, so…

I don't fucking care. My god, I just. Don't. Care.