this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2024
204 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

30564 readers
167 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] andrewrgross@slrpnk.net 144 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

I don't know if this is a hot take, but I think allowing straight and cis people to identify as such is appropriate, because the alternative assumes that we live in a state of default heteronormativity.

If anything, I want to live in a world where homophobes get mad that if they want to be assumed to be straight online they have to identify like anyone else. No one gets assumed to be straight any more. That's better imo.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 38 points 2 weeks ago

Nothing I enjoy more than asking a good ol' boy his pronouns.

[–] Toribor@corndog.social 34 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

The default should be "I'm horny" but unless I specify you have to guess who I'm horny for.

[–] andrewrgross@slrpnk.net 22 points 2 weeks ago

Maybe one day we can get there, but right now it might be better for a lot of folks if the default was "I'm not horny".

But I'm with you on the dream.

[–] madjo@feddit.nl 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Wow such asexual-phobia! (/s but only a little) Not everyone is "horny".

[–] Toribor@corndog.social 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

No shade to my Ace friends intended. Totally possible to be horny for art or rock collecting or whatever. Doesn't have to be a sexy thing. I'm horny for none of the above is totally valid.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 17 points 1 week ago

as an almost maximally privileged person (cis straight etc), i want my whining fellows to shut the fuck up. Just stop. Stop taking up all the god damn space. Just be quiet. It's okay not to be included in every scene all the time.

Your point about not assuming people are straight by default is valid. But I mostly just want some cis-het folks to stop embarrassing me by being fucking insufferable.

[–] P4ulin_Kbana@lemmy.eco.br 3 points 2 weeks ago

Uh, maybe I will have to specify myself, too. Never tought like that.

[–] brsrklf@jlai.lu 69 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The quotation marks are a nice touch. Quality trolling.

[–] FlihpFlorp@lemm.ee 24 points 2 weeks ago

I think a question mark in parentheses would also do the trick

[–] savvywolf@pawb.social 62 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Finally, representation for gay people who are into irony.

[–] Megaman_EXE@beehaw.org 30 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Brooo you can get the title of shithead? Why would you wana be labeled as straight when you could be shithead instead? lol. That's what I would go for haha

[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 3 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah I'd much rather take that over any sexuality. It's a much deeper insight into my personality than just "straight".

[–] headerfile@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Obviously that steam guy was probably coming from a place of bad faith, but the response is maybe imperfect no? This would look pretty bad if the roles were reversed I think. (genuine question I am hoping I am told why this may not be the case; I have nowhere else to ask)

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 29 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's okay to take context into account and not just look at it as a math problem. Targeting a minority isn't the same as doing it to people who make up 90% of society but are whiny.

[–] headerfile@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I totally agree that an unacceptable proportion of straight people are whiny about any manner of minority representation, but doesn't this also affect straight people who are normal about this? Maybe it'd be more fitting to give a demeaning title to homophobes, eg. the steam complainer, but provide regular title to everyone else somehow? Thanks for taking the time!

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

I mean, are straight people who are normal about it clamoring for the title to begin with? This seems like a problem invented basically entirely by the whiners. You could just as easily say it affects gay people who want an ironic title, or straight trans people, but for obvious reasons the whiners don’t really care about that.

All that said I have no idea what the price tag means in terms of gameplay time to acquire it. If it’s unachievable without 10 hours of grinding or something that’s a little mean, but not enough that I really care.

(Edit: accidentally a word)

[–] headerfile@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah a title in some fishing game definitely seems like a really strange thing to be upset about (and yeah you're totally right that this doesn't just affect cis straight people). I'm just saying that the presence of only that title for people who would like a regular version or don't care about titles and just see it in passing might feel unwelcome through no fault of their own y'know? (Though obviously feeling unwelcome would be a little ironic)

[–] homewardbone@beehaw.org 2 points 2 weeks ago

I’m just saying that the presence of only that title for people who would like a regular version or don’t care about titles and just see it in passing might feel unwelcome through no fault of their own y’know?

I completely agree with this. For example, they don't currently have a gender fluid title. Most gender fluid folks may not be clamoring for them to add the title but if they joined the game and saw that the gender fluid tag was harder to obtain for no discernible reason, was in air quotes, and had the description "mhm" I think they would feel pretty unwelcome. Also - a lot of people won't know the context that there were people complaining about the lack of the title.

[–] thief_of_names@beehaw.org 3 points 2 weeks ago

I haven't played the game for very long, but from what I've seen it would take a few hours to get to the point that you can just get a thousand bucks and blow them on a title, but it's entirely doable. You would have to focus on upgrades anyways to start with just to get a proper income up and running, and then once you can fish with greater speed and with a greater success rate it should be fairly trivial.

[–] bilb@lem.monster 21 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I don't think its ethical to portray straight people in video games at all.

[–] DdCno1@beehaw.org 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Bioware is well ahead of you. Haven't most of their romanceable NPCs been bisexual for ages now?

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 7 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Any game that doesn't make all NPCs "opportunistically bisexual" pisses me off. Quit locking content behind my character's pronouns.

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 4 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I'm sort of the opposite. Give characters sexualities! Make them people! Give them criteria by which they will or won't find my character attractive! I feel gross when every NPC is pansexual and aggressively attracted to the main character for no reason. Then again, I'm acespec, so.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

For my part I didn't mind that so much in Cyberpunk 2077, I just played it multiple times with different V characters.

But then I can see that it's a big time investment and not good for everyone.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 2 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, I'm usually only playing games once. I don't want to be forced to replay just to see content like that.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I DEMAND EQUAL OPPORTUNITY OBJECTIFICATION IN VIDEO GAMES

NO /S

Except some aces here and there, for the homies to talk about books with.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I still think asexual characters should be "romanceable". Like, there shouldn't be increased-friendship related content behind gender.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 3 points 2 weeks ago

Still salty about Tali and Visas.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jlow@beehaw.org 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The roles are not reversed, though (quite the opposite), so no need to worry about that:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dw_mRaIHb-M

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 weeks ago

Obviously that steam guy was probably coming from a place of bad faith

The Steam forums actively encourage this kind of bad faith behavior:

  1. when a post gets a new reply it's moved to the top of the forums. So as long as people are engaging with a post, even if it's just to make fun of a bigot, it keeps getting pushed back to the top.

  2. Users can "award" posts for various things (helpfull, cool, funny, etc) and users have taken to giving 'Clown' awards as a way of making fun of posts. Whenever one of your posts gets an award, you are given Steampoints you can use in the Steam cosmetics store.

This results in every game having bad faith posts "complaining" about wokeness so that people will make fun of them with Clown awards as a way to farm Steampoints. The developer bringing attention to it just helps them get more.

[–] realcaseyrollins@thelemmy.club 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If a community was fighting over something so trivial like this I'd consider leaving the game entirely.

[–] Azzu@lemm.ee 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Then you should probably leave every game, because you can probably find some dumbfucks that argue about this everywhere. There are less than 30 people posting on this Steam discussion linked.

[–] TehPers@beehaw.org 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

On this topic, I remember seeing a thread for Frostpunk 2 asking if it had DEI stuff in it.

There aren't even any real characters in Frostpunk 2. Tf are you talking about DEI for in a game with no real characters?

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 2 points 2 weeks ago

The closest thing to DEI I can even begin to think of in Frost punk 1 was that you could manufacture prosthetics for amputees.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Wait... This is an entire game? I've seen memes of it and I thought it was about an update to Animal Crossing.

[–] Lumu@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's very fun, feels like a return to simple web chatroom type games that I've really been longing for. It's real enjoyable if the idea of casual fishing with some random people seems appealing to you!

[–] millie@beehaw.org 3 points 2 weeks ago

Spam G in support.

Meow meow meow.

load more comments
view more: next ›