this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2024
178 points (96.8% liked)

Technology

59358 readers
4896 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Mandy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 hours ago

The EU already doesn't like what google and the like are doing, maybe this gives them proper ammo

[–] Routhinator@startrek.website 22 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Users are testing the impact of not using Google.

Spoiler: non-LLM enshittified search engines return reliable results and usually are not censored.

[–] lando55@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago

I've been testing this for years now and the transition has been seamless

[–] qyron@sopuli.xyz 12 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Somebody help get my ideas straight on this one, please.

To my knowledge, Bing and Google search engine are the default options available out there, to the point other search services relay service from those, give or take a few tweaks (DuckDuckGo, Startpage, etc).

Now lets remove those from the picture and what is left?

I read a post yesterday announcing Ecosia amd Qwant were joining efforts to build a fully european search engine (hopefully, yes, but I'm not holding my breath on it). Maybe that is an option. But what else?

[–] MightyCuriosity@sh.itjust.works 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Cyber@feddit.uk 1 points 3 hours ago

Wow. I'm going to have to try some of those out! Thanks

[–] jaxiiruff@lemmy.zip 132 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Big tech needs to be stopped yesterday. This literally has china great firewall energy and I hate it.

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 5 points 20 hours ago

My brother in Lemmy, this is what stopping Big Tech looks like.

Europe made laws that say that Google and others need to pay if they want to link to EU publishers. Well, maybe the price they are asking is not worth it.

You're right about the firewall energy, but that's simply how these laws work. The point of copyright, as well as age verification and other such laws, is to control who may access certain information.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Big tech needs to be stopped yesterday. This literally has china great firewall energy and I hate it.

This is one of the rare occasions I'm siding with Google. The news outlets are claiming that they should be paid money for those result snippets. It's not because I'm caring for Google so much but because that stance hurts small search engines.

[–] cbarrick@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

EU: You have to pay to show our news.

Google: Ok. We won't show your news.

EU: Pikachu face

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago

That's what basically happened in Germany like 10, 15 years ago when the first publisher had that idea. Its news stories would still show up in search results but only the headline, not that text snippet and no thumbnail image. These results were less attractive to users, so traffic from Google to those web sites crashed down by like 80, 90 percent.

In the end the publishers gave Google a free license to reproduce text snippets and thumbnails. The tightened copyright law provision wasn't repealed. Small search engines without leverage still (AFAIK to this day) have to pay.

So Google pays nothing, publishers earn nothing, upstart search engines can't afford the fees, and so Google leaves even more in power because of a law not even they wanted.

[–] Lennny@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Not wanting to appear on Google is how we're going to get EVEN more dailymail type shit.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Europe asked Google to do this so they can monitor what kind of influence Google has.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I mean, they've done this when places charge them money to index the news articles there.

It hardly seems reasonable to both mandate that they index a given piece of news media and that they pay a fee to do so.

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago

A US news echo chamber at the whims of whatever they think will appease trump is going to be horrifying...

[–] Tabula_stercore@lemmy.world 67 points 1 day ago

If they could at the same time make one without usa news that would be great

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] silva@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I just clicked on that link and the first headline is about Barbados, a country very clearly not in Europe. Lol

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

On 30 November 2021, Barbados transitioned to a republic within the Commonwealth, replacing its monarchy with a ceremonial president.

if you take a quick look at other news from Barbados, you would understand why ☞ https://www.theguardian.com/world/barbados

it was "spectacular" with Rihanna attending the ceremony ☞ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oWbC1H7RJHI

not that i'm a fan. I just remember reading about it, and it's only been 3 years

[–] gentooer@programming.dev 1 points 25 minutes ago

This has "Brazil, neighbouring country to France" energy.