this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2024
612 points (99.2% liked)

politics

19091 readers
3409 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NastyNative@mander.xyz 4 points 2 hours ago

This AG appointment is the biggest troll but the dude stayed loyal to Trump.

[–] AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee 2 points 2 hours ago

"Had sex with" is a weird way to say raped

[–] ageek@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

I wouldn't be surprised if Trump comes out and says that you have to be good at breaking the law before you can apply it

[–] PortoPeople@lemm.ee 32 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Ups his cred with Republicans. They love pedophiles.

[–] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 47 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

That should probably give him a huge assist within trump’s regime. They seem to love that type of thing.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 10 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Why do you think he was selected for AG?

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 3 hours ago

Partly, to make the House drop their investigation because he's no longer a member...

I knew it was going to be bad, but holy shit...

I've also noticed nobody has even mentioned EPA. My guess is that he will just do away with it altogether.

[–] Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 221 points 21 hours ago (4 children)

It's reasonably possible that trump likes him specifically because of these accusations.

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 36 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

What the hell are you talking about?

The president-elect has no idea what Gaetz looks like. The president-elect doesn’t even know Gaetz. The president-elect has never considered Gaetz for AG. The president-elect and Gaetz have never met.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 30 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

For the uninformed, this is funny (and sarcasm) because there's mountains of evidence of them together. Besides, you know, picking him for AG. But he tries this defense all the time anyway, and people actually believe it.

Just like explicitly Trump calling up members of Congress to kill the bipartisan border bill, and then blaming the Democrats for not passing a border bill. They sold that one on the campaign trail too, and it worked.

Sources

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 hours ago

People don't actually believe it, they're just looking for an opportunity to give themselves plausible deniability. To let themselves off the hook for being complete pieces of shit.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 6 points 6 hours ago

To be fair Tim Walz tried to point out that Trump voted down the Border Bill.... and everyone just laughed at him and called him Tampon Tim because America is currently in its "Too Dumb To Live" phase

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Thank you. I don’t mark my sarcasm and I thought I was going to get my post removed for misinformation again lol

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, there's another one not marked that's been up for hours. "Tulsi Gabbard to be Director of National Security." Yeah, okay. Funny joke.

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 hours ago

It looks like your memory doesn’t extend before 2020. If you can recall further, you will remember that jokes in the 2020+ era may not be considered jokes in the 2016-2020 era

[–] NJSpradlin@lemmy.world 65 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

People who have baggage are easily controllable. Trump’s a mob boss, and he’s equally in the pocket of Putin. He’s used to these tactics.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 25 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (8 children)

Every pick has been specifically chosen to be bad for their role.

Gaetz was 100% chosen for ATTORNEY GENERAL because of the accusations.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

It's like one massive trolling so they can say "see how bad it could have been? Now take this close to but not quite as bad choice and like it."

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 10 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Kinda feels like it. I wonder if the idea is to lower the bar for the next pick -- someone who sucks 75% as badly?

[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago

I think he's testing loyalty in the party. I think he wants exactly who he has chosen.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 44 points 18 hours ago

"These allegations are invented and would constitute false testimony to Congress," Gaetz said in response to ABC News' reporting.

AG Gaetz has his first case all lined up doesn't he?

[–] penquin@lemm.ee 95 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

You know what's fucking infuriating? Nothing will happen to this fucker at all.

[–] RagingNerdoholic@lemmy.ca 30 points 18 hours ago (7 children)

Nothing has happened to captain cheeto after he literally raped a child, so I can't say I'm surprised.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 118 points 21 hours ago (5 children)

The article mentions that he paid her to have sex with him at a party. That also makes it a sex trafficking crime. Also, IANAL but if the jurisdiction had an age of consent lower than 18, the sex trafficking part might negate that.

Also, Gaetz, who was born in 1982, was 35 at the time -- double her age and well outside the limits of any potential Romeo & Juliet laws.

[–] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 14 points 14 hours ago

These parties were also said to be full of drugs (in addition to alcohol), which one could argue blurs any consent, especially when your looking at a 35/yr old man wanting to pay a 17/yr girl for sex. He was also a congressman by then, which also makes this a very lopsided power dynamic when arguing consent with a possibly intoxicated underage girl.

The woman's allegation regarding Gaetz became part of the investigation following claims by Greenberg, a former friend of Gaetz who is currently serving an 11-year prison sentence after reaching a deal with investigators in May 2021 in which he pleaded guilty to multiple federal crimes, including sex trafficking of the woman when she was a minor and introducing her to other "adult men" who also had sex with her when she was underage.

This part also make one more inclined to believe this has something to it, and probably more women that aren't coming forward because of all the death threats and toxicity projected at victims.

AND HE IS SUPPOSED TO BE OUR NEW AG!!

[–] NJSpradlin@lemmy.world 29 points 20 hours ago (10 children)

Guy seriously broke the ‘half your age + seven’ rule. Off with his head.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 4 points 12 hours ago

It's 1/7th your age plus 2, right?

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

This guy looks like insane Jack Torrance

I'd say that he's the adult version of Butthead in the reboot of Beavis and Butthead. But i gotta ask: what does sane Jack Torrance look like..?

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 33 points 20 hours ago (9 children)

So, we are going to have an actual child-fucker as AG.

Republicans, "the party of law and order".

🤣

Btw, if there is anyone that I would believe would feed on adrenochrome....just look at Gaetz. Sure, the adrenochrome thing is just rehashed antisemitic blood libel bullshit, but I could see Gaetz maybe trying it out to see....

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›