this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2024
55 points (98.2% liked)

politics

19107 readers
2881 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 33 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

lol. Wait until a head of lettuce costs $14.

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 28 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (2 children)

It'll be because democrats are trying to raise the minimum wage and let trans people be represented in libraries.

/s, cuz I get in trouble for not relaying sarcasm well

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 7 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

It's because sarcasm doesn't work well over text.

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 7 points 1 hour ago

YOU DON'T WORK WELL OVER TEXT!!!

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world -4 points 1 hour ago

This place is no different from reddit. Users too dumb to read obvious sarcasm. Pathetic we have to use /s on such blatant posts.

[–] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 18 points 1 hour ago

Would that be Trump voting farmers?

[–] Pistcow@lemm.ee 20 points 2 hours ago

Good, fuck them for voting against their own interest and deport the second-third generatiom Mexicans thar voted for Trump.

[–] mysticpickle@lemmy.ca 3 points 41 minutes ago

Leopards are going to be eating well the next few years :>

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 25 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Would these be the same farmers that voted for Trump? 🤔

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 40 minutes ago

"Ah sure ahm tired of all the mean tweets, but he tells it like it is!"

[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 15 points 1 hour ago (5 children)

Yeah, if Trump deports all those people, who will we exploit for cheap labor?

[–] aramis87@fedia.io 2 points 27 minutes ago (1 children)

To deport someone, the receiving country has to agree to accept them. Mexico will accept their own nationals, and possibly those of some other countries, but they won't accept everyone. What do you do with people who's country refuses to accept them back (this has happened)? And what do you do with them when you can't determine where to send them back to? You've already promised they won't be let loose, so you'll put them into containment facilities - all very hastily-built, because there are so many people you've accumulated so quickly.

But you have more people than you know what to do with, and they're all just idling in the camps, and the nation is desperate for workers. The temptation is too great: instead of spending all this money maintaining the camps, you can offset the expenses by renting them to various industries as cheap labor.

It's still expensive, your people still resent spending money on them, and you still want to deport them, so you don't spend much on food or medicine or clothes or sanitation. Winter comes, disease rips through the camps, and masses die - but that's not your responsibility, these things happen ...

Just a reminder that most of the concentration camps Germany built weren't extermination camps, they were slave labor camps but the administration didn't care if the prisoners died of disease or injury, they'd just round up more people to feed the German machine.

[–] SolacefromSilence@fedia.io 2 points 19 minutes ago

They'll strike a deal with some other country to take them. Then issue contracts for private chartered flights at $10k/person, given to their best buddies.

https://www.bbc.com/news/explainers-61782866

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 13 points 1 hour ago

Yeah, I'm absolutely opposed to this deportation thing, it's cruel and if anything I feel that we should be encouraging more immigrants to come here, but the "it'll be bad because it'll get rid of all the people who do these jobs american citizens don't want to do" line does sorta gloss over the fact that if the job conditions are so bad that if people have literally any other option the role goes unfilled, something probably needs to be done to improve the conditions of that job, especially if it is as vital as food production.

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 7 points 1 hour ago

Is it you and me? I bet it's you and me.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Well I'm hoping white people but we know how well that worked in Georgia and Arizona, we found out they're just too soft to work those jobs despite being told they would be taking their jerb back

[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 8 points 1 hour ago

The migrant workers are often subjected to working conditions that would violate federal worker protection laws, but because they are in the country illegally, they don't report the poor working conditions out of fear. That's exploitation, through and through. No worker should be expected to tolerate such poor treatment, regardless of skin color.

[–] LuxSpark@lemmy.cafe 12 points 2 hours ago

Let the face eating begin!

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 23 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

The FO phase can finally begin

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 20 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

It happened in 2016 and they found out and they went back to the trough for more toadstool.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 6 points 1 hour ago

This is the rare FA[FAFO]FO.