this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2024
288 points (98.3% liked)

Greentext

4416 readers
1178 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Boxscape@lemmy.sdf.org 24 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Anon doubts WW2 Germany

Poor Franz

[–] thisisbutaname@discuss.tchncs.de 38 points 3 hours ago (4 children)

Well, not to defend the nazis or anything, but they did manage to make considerable amounts of damage and it took multiple great powers working together to beat them back.

[–] TSG_Asmodeus@lemmy.world 15 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

That's how Fascists work though. They pick fights with bigger and bigger opponents -- because they're invulnerable, you see -- until they lose. Their economy was absolutely insane, and required flat out pillaging their neighbours. Eventually your neighbours are too big to pillage.

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 hour ago

Isn't that not just an imperialistic trait, not necessarily a fascistic one? Franco's Spain didn't collapse, while it was still very much fascistic.

All the while, this trait is very much applicable to the Roman, Ottoman, Soviet or US empires.

[–] tibi@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

Also, they successfully occupied most of the countries in western and central Europe. It's only when they tried to expand into Russia that the war started. If they didn't pick a fight with the russians, the Third Reich would have lasted much longer.

They won many wars in a row without losing. Then they just overdid it a lil bit at the end and got bonked. They couldve had a huge empire if they just stopped a bit earlier.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 13 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

I won’t say Finland or Thailand were great powers but Japan had a decent showing so it’s not like they were alone

Though it really only took USSR to beat Germany

[–] hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 0 points 43 minutes ago* (last edited 42 minutes ago)

I think a major part of getting "beat" is they fought the USSR in the east and simultaneously the USA and UK in the west. I mean the war against Stalin wasn't going super smoothy. But it went on since 1941 already. And it really went south for the nazis when the USA joined WW2.

[–] Roflmasterbigpimp@lemmy.world 28 points 4 hours ago
[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 65 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Same with the confederacy:

  • lasted just 4 years
  • lost a war against the USA

Yet their flags are waived around with pride 250+ years later. How perfectly normal

[–] Habahnow@sh.itjust.works 15 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

wasn't even the last one standing on the losing side either. Japanese people are better than the master race?

[–] Sonor@lemmy.world 14 points 4 hours ago

Well, how much hentai did the nazis produce? Smh

[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 13 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Also did you know Hitler was a tweaker?

[–] UwUhugger@lemmy.world 10 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

U mean a druggy?

Everyone used to consume inorbitant amounts of hard drugs! Thats the charm of the time!

Or like are you to implying the narrative of nazi generals? That the war would have been won tups if Hitler didn’t meddle? ‘Cause thats also not true! The war rememtos are complete lies meant to convince nato to hire them as advisers, which they would have anyways. If things were to shit the fan with the ussr then they wanted the german militia…

[–] Rolder@reddthat.com 3 points 2 hours ago

Won the war? Nah. Been much more of a pain in the ass for the allies to win? Probably